| Internet-Draft | Configuration Tracing via trace-id | January 2024 |
| Quilbeuf, et al. | Expires 13 July 2024 | [Page] |
Network equipment are often configured by a variety of network management systems (NMS), protocols, and teams. If a network issue arises (e.g., because of a wrong configuration change), it is important to quickly identify the root cause and obtain the reason for pushing that modification. Another potential network issue can stem from concurrent NMSes with overlapping intents, each having their own tasks to perform. In such a case, it is important to map the respective modifications to its originating NMS.¶
This document specifies a NETCONF mechanism to automatically map the configuration modifications to their source, up to a specific NMS change request. Such a mechanism is required, in particular, for autonomous networks to trace the source of a particular configuration change that led to an anomaly detection. This mechanism facilitates the troubleshooting, the post mortem analysis, and in the end the closed loop automation required for self-healing networks. The specification also includes a YANG module that is meant to map a local configuration change to the corresponding trace id, up to the controller or even the orchestrator.¶
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.¶
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/JeanQuilbeufHuawei/draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 July 2024.¶
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Issues arising in the network, for instance violation of some SLAs, might be due to some configuration modification. In the context of automated networks, the assurance system needs not only to identify and revert the problematic configuration modification, but also to make sure that it won't happen again and that the fix will not disrupt other services. To cover the last two points, it is imperative to understand the cause of the problematic configuration change. Indeed, the first point, making sure that the configuration modification will not be repeated, cannot be ensured if the cause for pushing the modification in the first place is not known. Ensuring the second point, not disrupting other services, requires as well knowing if the configuration modification was pushed in order to support new services. Therefore, we need to be able to trace a configuration modification on a device back to the reason that triggered that modification, for instance in a NMS, whether the controller or the orchestrator.¶
This specification focuses only on configuration pushed via NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The rationale for this choice is that NETCONF is better suited for normalization than other protocols (SNMP, CLI). Another reason is that the notion of trace context, useful to track configuration modifications, has been ported to NETCONF in [I-D.rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension] and RESTCONF in [I-D.rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers].¶
The same network element, or NETCONF [RFC6241] server, can be configured by different NMSs or NETCONF clients. If an issue arises, one of the starting points for investigation is the configuration modification on the devices supporting the impacted service. In the best case, there is a dedicated user for each client and the timestamp of the modification allows tracing the problematic modification to its cause. In the worst case, everything is done by the same user and some more correlations must be done to trace the problematic modification to its source.¶
This document specifies a mechanism to automatically map the configuration modifications to their source, up to a specific NMS service request. Practically, this mechanism annotates configuration changes on the configured element with sufficient information to unambiguously identify the corresponding transaction, if any, on the element that requested the configuration modification. It reuses the concept of Trace Context [W3C-Trace-Context] applied to NETCONF as in [I-D.ietf-netconf-transaction-id] The information needed to trace the configuration is stored in a new YANG module that maps a local configuration change to some additional metadata. The additional metadata contains the trace ID, and, if the local change is not the beginning of the trace, the ID of the client that triggered the local-change.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
This document uses the terms client and server from [RFC6241].¶
This document uses the terms transaction and Transaction ID from [I-D.ietf-netconf-transaction-id].¶
This document uses the term trace ID from [W3C-Trace-Context].¶
This document was written with autonomous networks in mind. We assume that an existing monitoring or assurance system, such as described in [RFC9417], is able to detect and report network anomalies , e.g. SLA violations, intent violations, network failure, or simply a customer issue. Here are the use cases for the proposed YANG module.¶
Taking into account that many network anomalies are due to configuration mistakes, this mechanism allows to find out whether the offending configuration modification was triggered by a tracing-enabled client/NMS. In such a case, we can map the offending configuration modification id on a server/NE to a local configuration modification id on the client/NMS. Assuming that this mechanism (the YANG module) is implemented on the controller, we can recursively find, in the orchestrator, the latest (set of of) service request(s) that triggered the configuration modification. Whether this/those service request(s) are actually the root cause needs to be investigated. However, they are a good starting point for troubleshooting, post mortem analysis, and in the end the closed loop automation, which is absolutely required for for self-healing networks.¶
Building on the previous use case is the situation where two NMS's, unaware of the each other, are configuring a common router, each believing that they are the only NMS for the common router. So one configuration executed by the NMS1 is overwritten by the NMS2, which in turn is overwritten by NMS1, etc.¶
Autonomous networks will be solved first by assuring intent per specific domain; for example data center, core, cloud, etc. This last use case is a more specific "Concurrent NMS configuration" use case where assuring domain intent breaks the entire end to end service, even if the domain-specific controllers are aware of each other.¶
During onboarding, a newly added device is likely to receive a multiple configuration message, as it needs to be fully configured. Our use cases focus more on what happens after the initial configuration is done, i.e. when the "stable" configuration is modified.¶
This document assumes that NETCONF clients or servers (orchestrators, controllers, devices, ...) have some kind of mechanism to record the modifications done to the configuration. For instance, devices typically have an history of configuration changes and this history associates a locally unique identifier to some metadata, such as the timestamp of the modification, the user doing the modification or the protocol used for the modification. Such a locally unique identifier is a Local Commit ID, we assume that it exists on the platform. This Local Commit ID is the link between the module presented in this draft and the device-specific way of storing configuration changes.¶
This document assumes that each NETCONF client for which configuration must be traced (for instance orchestrator and controllers) has a unique client ID among the other NETCONF clients in the network. Such an ID could be an IP address or a host name. The mechanism for providing and defining this client ID is out of scope of the current document.¶
[I-D.rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension] defines a NETCONF extension providing the trace context from [W3C-Trace-Context]. Using this mechanism, the NETCONF server captures the trace-id, when available, and maps it to a local commit ID, by populating the YANG module.¶
+---------------+
| Orchestrator |
+---------------+
| tr-1, tx-1
v
+---------------+
| Controller |
+---------------+
tr-1, tx-2 | | tr-1, tx-3
v v
+-----+ +-----+
| NE1 | | NE2 |
+-----+ +-----+
It is technically possible that several clients push configuration to the candidate configuration datastore and only one of them commits the changes to the running configuration datastore. From the running configuration datastore perspective, which is the effective one, there is a single modification, but caused by several clients, which means that this modification should have several corresponding client-ids. Although, this case is technically possible, it is a bad practice. We won’t cover it in this document. In other terms, we assume that a given configuration modification on a server is caused by a single client, and thus has a single corresponding client-id.¶
The YANG module defined below enables tracing a configuration change in a Network Equipment back to its origin, for instance a service request in an orchestrator. To do so, the Anomaly Detection System (ADS) should have, for each client-id, access to some credentials enabling read access to the YANG module for configuration tracing on that client. It should as well have access to the network equipment in which an issue is detected.¶
+---------------+
.----------------[5]match tr-1-------------->| |
| | Orchestrator |
| ----------------[6]commit-id---------------| |
| | +---------------+
| | | tx-1
| | v
| | +---------------+
| | .-----------[3] match tr-1------------>| |
| | | | Controller |
| | | .-----------[4] c-id O tr-1----------| |
| | | | +---------------+
| | | | | tx-2
| v | v v
+-----------+ +----+
| Anomaly |--[1] match commit-id before time t-->| |
| Detection | | NE |
| System |<--------- [2] c-id C tr-1------------| |
+----------+ +----+
The steps for a software to trace a configuration modification in a Network Equipment back to a service request are illustrated in Figure 2. They are detailed below.¶
Note that step 5 and 6 are actually a repetition of step 3 and 4. The general algorithm is to continue looking for a client until no more client-id can be found in the current element.¶
We present in this section the YANG module for modelling the information about the configuration modifications.¶
The tree representation [RFC8340] of our YANG module is depicted in Figure 3¶
module: ietf-external-transaction-id
+--ro external-transactions-id
+--ro configuration-change* [local-commit-id]
+--ro local-commit-id string
+--ro timestamp? yang:date-and-time
+--ro trace-parent
| +--ro version? hex-digits
| +--ro trace-id? hex-digits
| +--ro parent-id? hex-digits
| +--ro trace-flags? hex-digits
+--ro client-id? string
The local-commit-id represents the local id of the configuration changes, which is device-specific. It can be used to retrieve the local configuration changes that happened during that transaction.¶
The trace-parent is present to identify the trace associated to the local-commit-id. This trace-parent can be transmitted by a client or created by the current server. In Section 4.4, the most important field in trace-parent is the trace-id. We also included the other fields for trace-parent as defined in [W3C-Trace-Context] for the sake of completion. In some cases, for instance direct configuration of the device, the device may choose to not include the trace-id.¶
The presence of a client-id indicates that the trace-parent has been transmitted by that client. If the trace is initiated by the current server, there is no associated client-id.¶
Even if this document focuses only on NETCONF or RESTCONF, the use cases defined in Section 3 are not specific to NETCONF or RESTCONF and the mechanism described in this document could be adapted to other configuration mechanisms. For instance, a configuration modification pushed via CLI can be identified via a label, which could contain the trace-parent. As such cases are difficult to standardize, we won’t cover them in this document.¶
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-external-transaction-id@2021-11-03.yang"
module ietf-external-transaction-id {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-external-transaction-id";
prefix ext-txid;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types, Section 3";
}
organization
"IETF NETCONF Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netconf/>
WG List: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
Author: Benoit Claise <mailto:benoit.claise@huawei.com>
Author: Jean Quilbeuf <mailto:jean.quilbeuf@huawei.com>";
description
"This module enables tracing of configuration changes in a
network for the sake of automated correlation between
configuration changes and the external request that triggered
that change.
The module stores the identifier of the trace, if any, that
triggered the change in a device. If that trace-id was provided
by a client, (i.e. not created locally by the server), the id
of that client is stored as well to indicated which client
triggered the configuration change.
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices. ";
revision 2022-10-20 {
description
"Initial revision";
reference
"RFC xxxx: Title to be completed";
}
typedef hex-digits {
type string {
pattern '[0-9a-f]*';
}
description
"A string composed of hexadecimal digits. Digits represented by
letters are restricted to lowercase so that a single
representation of a given value is allowed. This enables using
the string equality to check equality of the represented
values.";
}
grouping trace-parent-g {
description
"Trace parent frow the W3C trace-context recommandation.
Follows the format version 00.";
leaf version {
type hex-digits {
length "2";
}
must "../version = '00'";
description
"Version of the trace context. Must be 00 to match the
format described in this module.";
}
leaf trace-id {
type hex-digits {
length "32";
}
must "../trace-id != '00000000000000000000000000000000'";
description
"Trace ID that is common for every transaction that is
part of the configuration chain. This value can be used
to match a local commit id to a commit local to another
system.";
}
leaf parent-id {
type hex-digits {
length "16";
}
description
"ID of the request (client-side) that lead to configuring
the server hosting this module.";
}
leaf trace-flags {
type hex-digits {
length "2";
}
description
"Flags enabled for this trace. See W3C reference for the
details about flags.";
}
}
container external-transactions-id {
config false;
description
"Contains the IDs of configuration transactions that are
external to the device.";
list configuration-change {
key "local-commit-id";
description
"List of configuration changes, identified by their
local-commit-id";
leaf local-commit-id {
type string;
description
"Stores the identifier as saved by the server. Can be used
to retrieve the corresponding changes using the server
mechanism if available.";
}
leaf timestamp {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"A timestamp that can be used to further filter change
events.";
}
container trace-parent {
description
"Trace parent associated to the local-commit-id. If a
client ID is present as well, the trace context was
transmitted by that client. If not, the trace context was
created locally.
This trace-parent must come from the trace context of the
request actually modifying the running configuration
datastore. This request might be an edit-config or a
commit depending on whether the candidate datastore is
used.";
uses trace-parent-g;
}
leaf client-id {
type string;
description
"ID of the client that originated the modification, to
further query information about the corresponding
change.
This data node is present only when the configuration was
pushed by a compatible system.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>¶
This document includes no request to IANA.¶
01 -> 02¶
00 -> 01¶
The authors would like to thank Mohamed Boucadair, Jan Linblad and Roque Gagliano for their reviews and propositions.¶