<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629-xhtml.ent">
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std"
     ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="4583" updates="" number="9999"
     submissionType="IETF" consensus="true" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">

  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 2.22.3 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="BFCP">Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams</title>

    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9999"/>

    <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="Gonzalo Camarillo">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Hirsalantie 11</street>
          <code>02420</code>
          <city>Jorvas</city>
          <country>Finland</country>
        </postal>
        <email>Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Tom Kristensen" initials="T." surname="Kristensen">
      <organization>Cisco</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Philip Pedersens vei 1</street>
          <code>NO-1366</code>
          <city>Lysaker</city>
          <country>Norway</country>
        </postal>
        <email>tomkrist@cisco.com, tomkri@ifi.uio.no</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author initials="C.H." surname="Holmberg" fullname="Christer Holmberg">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Hirsalantie 11</street>
          <code>02420</code>
          <city>Jorvas</city>
          <country>Finland</country>
        </postal>
        <email>christer.holmberg@ericsson.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date month="June" year="2019"/>

    <area>Real-time Applications and Infrastructure</area>
<!--    <workgroup>BFCPbis Working Group</workgroup> -->
    <keyword>floor control</keyword>
    <keyword>BFCP</keyword>
    <keyword>SDP</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer/answer procedures for negotiating and establishing Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) streams.</t>
      <t>This document obsoletes RFC 4583. Changes from RFC 4583 are summarized in Section 14.</t>
      <!--                                 Ensure correct section #, as xref is not allowed in abstract -->
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">

<!-- [Reviewer]:  Search "TBD" throughout doc. -->

      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>As discussed in the BFCP (Binary Floor Control Protocol) specification <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>, a 
    given BFCP client needs a set of data in order to establish a BFCP connection to a floor control server. This data includes 
    the transport address of the server, the conference identifier, and the user identifier.</t>
      <t>One way for clients to obtain this information is to use an SDP offer/answer <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/> exchange. 
    This document specifies how to encode this information in the SDP session descriptions that are part of such an offer/answer 
    exchange.</t>
      <t>User agents typically use the offer/answer model to establish a number of media streams of different types. 
    Following this model, a BFCP connection is described as any other media stream by using an SDP 'm' line, possibly
    followed by a number of SDP lines that also apply to the BFCP connection.</t>

 <ul>    
<li><xref target="sec_m-line" format="default"/> defines how the field values in 'm' line representing a BFCP connection are set.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_attributes" format="default"/> defines SDP attributes that are used when negotiating a BFCP connection.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_mux-cons" format="default"/> defines multiplexing considerations for a BFCP connection.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_bfcp-connection" format="default"/> defines procedures for managing a BFCP connection.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_authentication" format="default"/> defines TLS and DTLS considerations when negotiating a BFCP connection.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_ice-considerations" format="default"/> defines the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) 
    <xref target="RFC8445" format="default"/> considerations when negotiating a BFCP connection.</li>
      <li><xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/> defines
      the SDP offer/answer procedures for negotiating a BFCP connection.</li>
 </ul>

    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Conventions</name>
      <t>
      The key words <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>, <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>, <bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>, <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>, <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>, <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, <bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>,
      <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>, and <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default"/>
      when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_server-determination" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Floor Control Roles</name>
      <t>
       When two endpoints establish a BFCP stream, they need to determine which of them acts as a floor control client and which acts as a floor control server. 
      </t>
      <t>
       Once the roles have been determined, the roles will apply to all BFCP-controlled streams associated with the BFCP stream.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_m-line" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Fields in the 'm' Line</name>
      <t>According to the SDP specification <xref target="RFC4566" format="default"/>, the 'm' line format is the following:</t>

<sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
   m=&lt;media&gt; &lt;port&gt; &lt;proto&gt; &lt;fmt&gt; ...
      ]]></sourcecode>

      <t>This section describes how to generate an 'm' line of an SDP Media Description ('m' section) describing a BFCP stream.</t>
      <t>The media field <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have a value of "application".</t>
      <t>The port field is set, depending on the value of the proto field, as explained below.  A port field value of zero has the standard SDP meaning (i.e., rejection of the media stream) regardless of the proto field.</t>

    <ul>
        <li>When TCP is used as the transport, the port field is set following the rules in <xref target="RFC4145" format="default"/>. Depending on the value of the 'setup' attribute (discussed in <xref target="sec_tcp-connection" format="default"/>), the port field contains the port to which the remote endpoint will direct BFCP messages, or in the case where the endpoint will initiate the connection towards the remote endpoint, should be set to a value of 9.</li>
        <li>When UDP is used as the transport, the port field contains the port to which the remote endpoint will direct BFCP messages regardless of the value of the 'setup' attribute.</li>
    </ul>

      <t>This document defines five values for the proto field: TCP/BFCP, TCP/DTLS/BFCP, TCP/TLS/BFCP, UDP/BFCP, and UDP/TLS/BFCP.</t>
      <t>The proto value are used as described below:</t>

 <ul>
        <li>'TCP/BFCP' is used for TCP transport of BFCP without TLS encryption, and is backward compatible with endpoints that are compliant with RFC&nbsp;4583.</li>
        <li>'TCP/TLS/BFCP' is used for TCP transport of BFCP with TLS encryption, and is backward compatible with endpoints that are compliant with RFC&nbsp;4583 that support TLS.</li>
        <li>'UDP/BFCP' is used for UDP transport of BFCP without DTLS encryption <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/>.</li>
        <li>'UDP/TLS/BFCP' is used for UDP transport of BFCP with DTLS encryption. This is one of the options when ICE is used (<xref target="sec_ice-considerations" format="default"/>). It can also be used without ICE 
          when backward compatibility with endpoints that are compliant with RFC&nbsp;4583 is not required.</li>
        <li>'TCP/DTLS/BFCP' is used for TCP transport of BFCP with DTLS encryption, running on top of TCP using the framing method defined in <xref target="RFC4571" format="default"/>, with DTLS packets being 
          sent and received instead of RTP/RTCP packets using the shim defined in RFC 4571 such that the length field defined in RFC 4571 precedes each DTLS message. This is one of the options when 
          ICE is used (<xref target="sec_ice-considerations" format="default"/>). It can also be used without ICE when backward compatibility with endpoints that are compliant with RFC&nbsp;4583 is not required.</li>
 </ul>

      <t>The fmt (format) list is not applicable to BFCP. The fmt list of 'm' lines in the case of any proto field value related to BFCP <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a single "*" character. If the the fmt list contains any other value it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored.</t>
      <t>The following is an example of an 'm' line for a BFCP connection:</t>

      <sourcecode type="" ><![CDATA[
   m=application 50000 TCP/TLS/BFCP *
      ]]></sourcecode>

    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>SDP Attributes</name>
      <section anchor="sec_floorctrl-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SDP 'floorctrl' Attribute</name>
        <t>
         This section defines the SDP 'floorctrl' media-level attribute. The attribute is used to determine the floor control roles (client and server) for the endpoints associated with
         the BFCP stream.</t>

    <ul empty="true">
      <li>Attribute Name: floorctrl</li>

      <li>Attribute Value: floor-control</li>

      <li>Usage Level: media</li>

      <li>Charset Dependent: No</li>

      <li>Mux Category: TBD</li>
    </ul>

    <t>The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234"/> for the attribute is:</t>

     <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[
      floor-control = role *(SP role)
      role = "c-only" / "s-only" / "c-s"
      ]]></sourcecode>

        <t>An endpoint includes the attribute to indicate the role(s) it would be willing to perform for the BFCP-controlled media streams:</t>

        <ul>
        <li>c-only: The endpoint is willing to act as floor control client.</li>
        <li>s-only: The endpoint is willing to act as floor control server only.</li>
        </ul>

        <t>
        When inserted in an offer, the offerer <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> indicate multiple attribute values ("c-only" and "s-only"). When inserted in an answer, the answerer <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> 
        indicate only one attribute value: "c-only" or "s-only". The answerer indicates the role taken by the answerer. The offerer will then take the 
        opposite role.
        </t>
        <t>
        In <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/>, there was a third attribute specified, "c-s", which meant that an endpoint was willing to act as both floor control client and 
        floor control server at the same time for the BFCP stream, taking different roles for different BFCP-controlled media streams. The feature was underspecified 
        and implemented in different ways, in particular many implementations interpreted "c-s" to mean that the endpoint is willing to act as either client or server 
        (equivalent to "c-only s-only"). An implementation compliant to this specification <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> include the "c-s" floorctl attribute value in an offer or in an answer, 
        but <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept the attribute value in an offer and process it as equivalent to "c-only s-only" (or "s-only c-only"). Also, as an implementation compliant to 
        this specification is only allowed to include one role, either 'c-only' or 's-conly', in an answer, each endpoint will only take one role, and as a result 
        the endpoint will take the same role for each BFCP-controlled media stream associated with the BFCP stream.
        </t>
        <t>
        <xref target="tab-roles" format="default"/> shows the roles that the answerer is allowed to take, based on what roles the offerer has 
        indicated that it is willing to take.
        </t>
        <table anchor="tab-roles" align="center">
          <name>Roles</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="center">Offerer</th>
              <th align="center">Answerer</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">c-only</td>
              <td align="center">s-only</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">s-only</td>
              <td align="center">c-only</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">c-s</td>
              <td align="center">c-only</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center">c-s</td>
              <td align="center">s-only</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <t>
        Endpoints compliant with <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> might not include the 'floorctrl' attribute in offers and answerer. 
        If the 'floorctrl' attribute is not present, in order to be interoperable with such endpoints, the offerer will act as floor control client
        and the answerer will act as floor control server.
        </t>
        <t>
        The SDP Offer/Answer procedures for the 'floorctrl' attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/>.
        </t>
        <t>The following is an example of a 'floorctrl' attribute in an offer:</t>
        <sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
          a=floorctrl:c-only s-only
        ]]></sourcecode>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec_confid-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SDP 'confid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
      This section defines the SDP 'confid' media-level attribute. The attribute is used by a floor control server 
      to convey the conference ID value to the floor control client, using decimal integer representation.
        </t>
   <ul empty="true">
      <li>Attribute Name: confid</li>

      <li>Attribute Value: conference-id</li>

      <li>Usage Level: media</li>

      <li>Charset Dependent: No</li>

      <li>Mux Category: TBD</li>
   </ul>

    <t>The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234"/> for the attribute is:</t>

    <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[
      conference-id = 1*DIGIT
       
      DIGIT = <DIGIT defined in [RFC5234]> 
      ]]></sourcecode>

      <t>The maximum value of the attribute is determined by the
      COMMON-HEADER format <xref target="BFCP"/>.</t>

        <t>
      The SDP Offer/Answer procedures for the 'confid' attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec_userid-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SDP 'userid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
      This section defines the SDP userid' media-level attribute. The attribute is used by a floor control server 
      to convey the user ID value to the floor control client, using decimal integer representation.
        </t>
    <ul empty="true">
      <li>Attribute Name: userid</li>

      <li>Attribute Value: user-id</li>

      <li>Usage Level: media</li>

      <li>Charset Dependent: No</li>

      <li>Mux Category: TBD</li>
    </ul>

    <t>The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234"/> for the attribute is:</t>

     <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[
      user-id = 1*DIGIT
      
      DIGIT = <DIGIT defined in [RFC5234]>
      ]]></sourcecode>

      <t>The maximum value of the attribute is determined by the
      COMMON-HEADER format <xref target="BFCP"/>.</t>

        <t>
      The SDP Offer/Answer procedures for the 'userid' attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec_floorid-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SDP 'floorid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
      This section defines the SDP 'floorid' media-level attribute. The attribute conveys a floor identifier, using decimal integer
      representation, and optionally pointers to one or more BFCP-controlled media streams.
        </t>
  <ul empty="true">
      <li>Attribute Name: floorid</li>

      <li>Attribute Value: floor-id</li>

      <li>Usage Level: media</li>

      <li>Charset Dependent: No</li>

      <li>Mux Category: TBD</li>
  </ul>

    <t>The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234"/> for the attribute is:</t>

     <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[
      floor-id = 1*DIGIT SP "mstrm:" token *(SP token)

      DIGIT = <DIGIT defined in [RFC5234]>
      token = <token defined in [RFC4566]>
      ]]></sourcecode>

      <t>The maximum value of the attribute is determined by the
      FLOOR-ID format <xref target="BFCP"/>.</t>

        <t>
      The floor identifier value is the integer representation of the Floor ID to be used in BFCP. Each media stream
      pointer value is associated with an SDP 'label' attribute <xref target="RFC4574" format="default"/> of a media stream.
        </t>
        <t>
      The SDP Offer/Answer procedures for the 'floorid' attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/>.
        </t>
        <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
          <li>
      Note: In <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> 'm-stream' was erroneously used in <xref target="sec_example" format="default"/>. Although the example was non-normative, it is 
      implemented by some vendors and occurs in cases where the endpoint is willing to act as a server. Therefore, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to support parsing and 
      interpreting 'm-stream' the same way as 'mstrm' when receiving.
    </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec_bfcp-version-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SDP 'bfcpver' Attribute</name>
        <t>
      This section defines the SDP 'bfcpver' media-level attribute. The attribute is used to negotiate the 
      BFCP version, using decimal integer representation.
        </t>

        <t>
      The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234" format="default"/> for the attributes is:
        </t>
  <ul empty="true">
      <li>Attribute Name: bfcpver</li>

      <li>Attribute Value: bfcp-version</li>

      <li>Usage Level: media</li>

      <li>Charset Dependent: No</li>

      <li>Mux Category: TBD</li>
  </ul>

    <t>The Augmented BNF syntax <xref target="RFC5234"/> for the attribute is:</t>

   <sourcecode type="abnf"><![CDATA[
      bfcp-version = version *(SP version)
      version      = 1*DIGIT

      DIGIT = <DIGIT defined in [RFC5234]>
      ]]></sourcecode>

      <t>The maximum value of the attribute is determined by the
      COMMON-HEADER format <xref target="BFCP"/>.</t>

        <t>
      An endpoint uses the 'bfcpver' attribute to convey the version(s) of BFCP supported by the endpoint, using integer values. For a given version, the attribute 
      value representing the version <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the "Version" field that would be presented in the BFCP COMMON-HEADER <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>. 
      The BFCP version that will eventually be used will be conveyed with a BFCP-level Hello/HelloAck.
        </t>
        <t>
      Endpoints compliant with <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> might not always include the 'bfcpver'
      attribute in offers and answers. The attribute value, if present, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be in accordance with 
      the definition of the Version field in <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>. If the 
      attribute is not present, endpoints <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assume a default value in accordance with 
      <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>: when used over a reliable transport the default 
      attribute value is "1", and when used over an unreliable transport the default attribute value 
      is "2". The value is inferred from the transport specified in the 'm' line (<xref target="sec_m-line" format="default"/>) 
      of the 'm' section associated with the stream. 
        </t>
        <t>
      The SDP Offer/Answer procedures for the 'bfcpver' attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_mux-cons" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Multiplexing Considerations</name>
      <t>
      <xref target="SDP-Bundle" format="default"/> defines how multiplexing of multiple media streams can be negotiated. This specification does not define
      how BFCP streams can be multiplexed with other media streams. Therefore, a BFCP stream <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be associated with a BUNDLE group <xref target="SDP-Bundle" format="default"/>.
      Note that BFCP-controlled media streams might be multiplexed with other media streams.
      </t>
      <t>
      <xref target="I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes" format="default"/> defines the mux categories for the SDP 
      attributes defined in this specification, except for the 'bfcpver' attribute. <xref target="tab_mux-tbd" format="default"/> defines the mux category 
      for the 'bfcpver' attribute:
      </t>
      <table anchor="tab_mux-tbd" align="center">
        <name>Multiplexing Attribute Analysis</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Name</th>
            <th align="left">Notes</th>
            <th align="left">Level</th>
            <th align="left">Mux Category</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">bfcpver</td>
            <td align="left">Needs further analysis in a separate specification</td>
            <td align="left">M</td>
            <td align="left">TBD</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_bfcp-connection" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>BFCP Connection Management</name>
      <t>
      BFCP streams can use TCP or UDP as the underlying transport. Endpoints exchanging BFCP messages over UDP send the BFCP messages towards the peer 
      using the connection address and port provided in the SDP 'c' and 'm' lines. TCP connection management is more complicated and is described in 
      the following section.
      </t>
      <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
        <li>Note: When using Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) <xref target="RFC8445" format="default"/>, TCP/DTLS/BFCP, or UDP/TLS/BFCP, the straight-forward procedures for connection management as UDP/BFCP described above apply. 
      TCP/TLS/BFCP follows the same procedures as TCP/BFCP and is described below.</li>
      </ul>
      <section anchor="sec_tcp-connection" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>TCP Connection Management</name>
        <t>
        The management of the TCP connection used to transport BFCP messages is performed using the SDP 'setup' and 'connection' attributes <xref target="RFC4145" format="default"/>.
        The 'setup' attribute indicates which of the endpoints initiates the TCP connection. The 'connection' attribute handles TCP connection re-establishment.
        </t>
        <t>
        The BFCP specification <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/> describes a number of situations when the TCP connection between a floor control client 
        and the floor control server needs to be re-established. However, that specification does not describe the re-establishment process because this process 
        depends on how the connection was established in the first place. Endpoints using the offer/answer mechanism follow the following rules.
        </t>
        <t>
        When the existing TCP connection is closed and re-established following the rules in <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>, the floor control client 
        <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send an offer towards the floor control server in order to re-establish the connection. If a TCP connection cannot deliver a BFCP message and times out, 
        the endpoint that attempted to send the message (i.e., the one that detected the TCP timeout) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send an offer in order to re-establish the TCP connection.
        </t>
        <t>
        Endpoints that use the offer/answer mechanism to negotiate TCP connections <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the 'setup' and 'connection' attributes.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_authentication" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>TLS/DTLS Considerations</name>
      <t>
       When DTLS is used with UDP, the generic procedures defined in
       <xref target="SDP-Offer-Answer" sectionFormat="of"
       section="5"/> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be followed.
      </t>
      <t>
       When TLS is used with TCP, once the underlying connection is established, the answerer always acts as the TLS server. 
       If the TCP connection is lost, the active endpoint <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> is responsible for re-establishing the TCP connection. Unless a new 
       TLS connection is negotiated, subsequent SDP offers and answers will not impact the previously negotiated TLS roles.
      </t>
      <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
        <li>
          Note: For TLS, it was decided to keep the original procedures in <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> to determine which endpoint 
          acts as the TLS server in order to retain backwards compatibility. 
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_ice-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>ICE Considerations</name>
      <t>
      Generic SDP offer/answer procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) are defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
      When BFCP is used with UDP based ICE candidates <xref target="RFC8445" format="default"/> then the procedures for UDP/TLS/BFCP are&nbsp;used.
      </t>
      <t>
      When BFCP is used with TCP based ICE candidates <xref target="RFC6544" format="default"/> then the procedures for TCP/DTLS/BFCP are&nbsp;used.
      </t>
      <t>
      Based on the procedures defined in <xref target="SDP-Offer-Answer" format="default"/>, endpoints treat all ICE candidate pairs associated with a BFCP stream on top of a DTLS association 
      as part of the same DTLS association. Thus, there will only be one BFCP handshake and one DTLS handshake even if there are multiple valid candidate pairs, 
      and if BFCP media is shifted between candidate pairs (including switching between UDP to TCP candidate pairs) prior to nomination. If new candidates are added, 
      they will also be part of the same DTLS association.
      </t>
      <t>
      In order to maximize the likelihood of interoperability between the endpoints, all ICE enabled BFCP-over-DTLS endpoints <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> 
      implement support for UDP/TLS/BFCP.
      </t>
      <t>
      When an SDP offer or answer conveys multiple ICE candidates for a BFCP stream, UDP based candidates <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be included and 
      the default candidate <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be chosen from one of those UDP candidates. If UDP transport is used for the default candidate, 
      then the 'm' line proto value <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be 'UDP/TLS/BFCP'. If TCP transport is used for the default candidate, the 'm' line proto 
      value <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be 'TCP/DTLS/BFCP'.
      </t>
      <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
        <li>Note: Usage of ICE with protocols other than UDP/TLS/BFCP and TCP/DTLS/BFCP is outside of scope for this specification.</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>SDP Offer/Answer Procedures</name>
      <t>
      This section defines the SDP offer/answer <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/> procedures for negotiating and establishing a BFCP stream. 
      Generic procedures for DTLS are defined in <xref target="SDP-Offer-Answer" format="default"/>. Generic procedures for TLS are defined 
      in <xref target="RFC8122" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
      This section only defines the BFCP-specific procedures. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the procedures apply to an 'm' section describing a BFCP stream. 
      If an offer or answer contains multiple 'm' sections describing BFCP streams, the procedures are applied independently to each stream.
      </t>
      <t>
      Within this document, 'initial offer' refers to the first offer, within an SDP session (e.g. a SIP
      dialog when the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) <xref target="RFC3261" format="default"/> is used to carry SDP) in which the offerer 
      indicates that it wants to negotiate the establishment of a BFCP stream.
      </t>
      <t>
      If the 'm' line 'proto' value is 'TCP/TLS/BFCP', 'TCP/DTLS/BFCP' or 'UDP/TLS/BFCP', the offerer and answerer follow the generic procedures 
      defined in <xref target="RFC8122" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
      If the 'm' line proto value is 'TCP/BFCP', 'TCP/TLS/BFCP', 'TCP/DTLS/TCP' or 'UDP/TLS/BFCP', the offerer and answerer 
      use the SDP 'setup' attribute according to the procedures in <xref target="RFC4145" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
      If the 'm' line proto value is 'TCP/BFCP', 'TCP/TLS/BFCP' or 'TCP/DTLS/BFCP', the offerer and anwerer use 
      the SDP 'connection' attribute according to the procedures in <xref target="RFC4145" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
        <li>Note: The use of source-specific SDP parameters <xref target="RFC5576" format="default"/> is not defined for BFCP streams.</li>
      </ul>
      <section anchor="oa-gen-initial-offer" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Generating the Initial SDP Offer</name>
        <t>
        When the offerer creates an initial offer, the offerer <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'floorctrl' attribute (<xref target="sec_floorctrl-attr" format="default"/>) 
        and an SDP 'bfcpver' attribute (<xref target="sec_bfcp-version-attr" format="default"/>) in the 'm' section.
        </t>
        <t>
        In addition, if the offerer includes an SDP 'floorctrl' attribute with 's-only' or 'c-s' attribute values in the offer, the offerer:
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'confid' attribute (<xref target="sec_confid-attr" format="default"/>) in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'userid' attribute (<xref target="sec_userid-attr" format="default"/>) in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'floorid' attribute (<xref target="sec_floorid-attr" format="default"/>) in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'label' attribute (<xref target="RFC4574" format="default"/>) with the 'm' section of each BFCP-controlled media stream.</li>
        </ul>
        <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
          <li>
          Note: If the offerer includes an SDP 'floorctrl' attribute with a 'c-s' attribute value, or both a 'c-only' and a 's-only' attribute value in the offer, 
          the attribute values above will only be used if it is determined (<xref target="sec_floorctrl-attr" format="default"/>) that the offerer will act as floor control server. 
        </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="oa-gen-answer" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Generating the SDP Answer</name>
        <t>
        When the answerer receives an offer that contains an 'm' section describing a BFCP stream, the answerer <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> check whether it supports 
        one or more of the BFCP versions supported by the offerer (<xref target="sec_bfcp-version-attr" format="default"/>). If the answerer does not support 
        any of the BFCP versions, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> accept the 'm' section. Otherwise, if the answerer accepts the 'm' section, it: 
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> insert a corresponding 'm' section in the answer, with an identical 'm' line proto value <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/>; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include a 'bfcpver' attribute in the 'm' section. The versions indicated by the answer <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same or a subset of the versions indicated by the offerer in the corresponding offer; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, if the offer contained an SDP 'floorctrl' attribute, include a 'floorctrl' attribute in the 'm' section.</li>
        </ul>
        <t>
        In addition, if the answerer includes an SDP 'floorctrl' attribute with an 's-only' attribute value in the answer, the answerer:
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'confid' attribute in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'userid' attribute in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'floorid' attribute in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include an SDP 'label' attribute in the 'm' section of each BFCP-controlled media stream.</li>
        </ul>
        <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
          <li>
          Note: An offerer compliant with <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> might not include 'floorctrl' and 'bfcpver' attributes in offers, in which cases
          the default values apply.
        </li>
        </ul>
        <t>
        Once the answerer has sent the answer, the answerer:
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, if the answerer is the active endpoint, and if a TCP connection associated with the 'm' section is to be established (or re-established), 
             initiate the establishing of the TCP connection; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, if the answerer is the active endpoint, and if an TLS/DTLS connection associated with the 'm' section is to be established (or re-established), 
             initiate the establishing of the TLS/DTLS connection (by sending a ClientHello message).</li>
        </ul>
        <t>
        If the answerer does not accept the 'm' section in the offer, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assign a zero port value to the 'm' line of the corresponding 'm' section in the answer. 
        In addition, the answerer <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> establish a TCP connection or a TLS/DTLS connection associated with the 'm' section.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="oa-offerer-processing-answer" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Offerer Processing of the SDP Answer</name>
        <t>
        When the offerer receives an answer that contains an 'm' section with a non-zero port value, describing a BFCP stream, the offerer:
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, if the offerer is the active endpoint, and if a TCP connection associated with the 'm' section is to be established (or re-established), 
             initiate the establishing of the TCP connection; and</li>
          <li><bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, if the offerer is the active endpoint, and if an TLS/DTLS connection associated with the 'm' section is to be established (or re-established), 
             initiate the establishing of the TLS/DTLS connection (by sending a ClientHello message).</li>
        </ul>

      <aside><t>
        Note: An answerer compliant with <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/> might not include 'floorctrl' and 'bfcpver' attributes in answers, 
        in which cases the default values apply.
      </t></aside>

<blockquote>
        Note: An answerer compliant with <xref target="RFC4583"
	format="default"/> might not include 'floorctrl' and 'bfcpver' attributes in answers, in which cases the default values apply.
</blockquote>

        <t>
        If the 'm' line in the answer contains a zero port value, or if the offerer for some other reason does not accept the answer (e.g., if the answerer only
        indicates support of BFCP versions not supported by the offerer), the offerer <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> establish a TCP connection or a TLS/DTLS connection associated with the 'm' section.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="oa-mod-session" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Modifying the Session</name>
        <t>
        When an offerer sends an updated offer, in order to modify a previously established BFCP stream, it follows the procedures 
        in <xref target="oa-gen-initial-offer" format="default"/>, with the following exceptions:
        </t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>If the BFCP stream is carried on top of TCP, and if the offerer does not want to re-establish an existing TCP connection, the offerer <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include 
             an SDP 'connection' attribute with a value of "existing", in the 'm' section; and</li>
          <li>If the offerer wants to disable a previously established BFCP stream, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assign a zero port value to the 'm' line associated with the 
             BFCP connection, following the procedures in <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/>.</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_example" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <t>For the purpose of brevity, the main portion of the session description is omitted in the examples, which only show 'm' sections and their 'm' lines and attributes.</t>
      <t>The following is an example of an offer sent by a conference server to a client.</t>
      <sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
m=application 50000 TCP/TLS/BFCP *
a=setup:actpass
a=connection:new
a=fingerprint:sha-256 \
     19:E2:1C:3B:4B:9F:81:E6:B8:5C:F4:A5:A8:D8:73:04: \
     BB:05:2F:70:9F:04:A9:0E:05:E9:26:33:E8:70:88:A2
a=floorctrl:c-only s-only
a=confid:4321
a=userid:1234
a=floorid:1 mstrm:10
a=floorid:2 mstrm:11
a=bfcpver:1 2
m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 0
a=label:10
m=video 50004 RTP/AVP 31
a=label:11
      ]]></sourcecode>
      <t>Note that due to RFC formatting conventions, this document splits SDP across lines whose content would exceed 72 characters. A backslash character marks where this line folding has taken place. This backslash and its trailing CRLF and whitespace would not appear in actual SDP content.</t>
      <t>The following is the answer returned by the client.</t>
      <sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
m=application 9 TCP/TLS/BFCP *
a=setup:active
a=connection:new
a=fingerprint:sha-256 \
     6B:8B:F0:65:5F:78:E2:51:3B:AC:6F:F3:3F:46:1B:35: \
     DC:B8:5F:64:1A:24:C2:43:F0:A1:58:D0:A1:2C:19:08
a=floorctrl:c-only
a=bfcpver:1
m=audio 55000 RTP/AVP 0
m=video 55002 RTP/AVP 31
      ]]></sourcecode>
      <t>A similar example using unreliable transport and DTLS is shown below, where the offer is sent from a client.</t>
      <sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
m=application 50000 UDP/TLS/BFCP *
a=setup:actpass
a=dtls-id:abc3dl
a=fingerprint:sha-256 \
     19:E2:1C:3B:4B:9F:81:E6:B8:5C:F4:A5:A8:D8:73:04: \
     BB:05:2F:70:9F:04:A9:0E:05:E9:26:33:E8:70:88:A2
a=floorctrl:c-only s-only
a=confid:4321
a=userid:1234
a=floorid:1 mstrm:10
a=floorid:2 mstrm:11
a=bfcpver:1 2
m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 0
a=label:10
m=video 50004 RTP/AVP 31
a=label:11
      ]]></sourcecode>
      <t>The following is the answer returned by the server.</t>
      <sourcecode type=""><![CDATA[
m=application 55000 UDP/TLS/BFCP *
a=setup:active
a=dtls-id:abc3dl
a=fingerprint:sha-256 \
     6B:8B:F0:65:5F:78:E2:51:3B:AC:6F:F3:3F:46:1B:35: \
     DC:B8:5F:64:1A:24:C2:43:F0:A1:58:D0:A1:2C:19:08
a=floorctrl:s-only
a=confid:4321
a=userid:1234
a=floorid:1 mstrm:10
a=floorid:2 mstrm:11
a=bfcpver:2
m=audio 55002 RTP/AVP 0
m=video 55004 RTP/AVP 31
      ]]></sourcecode>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_security" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>The BFCP <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>, SDP <xref target="RFC4566" format="default"/>, and offer/answer <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/> 
    specifications discuss security issues related to BFCP, SDP, and offer/answer, respectively. In addition, <xref target="RFC4145" format="default"/> 
    and <xref target="RFC8122" format="default"/> discuss security issues related to the establishment of TCP and TLS connections using an offer/answer 
    model. Furthermore, when using DTLS over UDP, the generic offer/answer considerations defined in 
    <xref target="SDP-Offer-Answer" format="default"/> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be followed.</t>
      <t>The usage of certain proto values in the SDP offer/answer negotiation will result in a BFCP stream that is not protected by 
    TLS or DTLS. Operators will need to provide integrity protection and confidentiality protection of the BFCP stream using other means.</t>
      <t>The generic security considerations associated with SDP attributes are defined in <xref target="RFC3264" format="default"/>. While the attributes
    defined in this specification do not reveal information about the content of individual BFCP controlled media streams, they do reveal 
    which media streams will be BFCP controlled.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_iana" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
        <li>[Editorial note: The changes in <xref target="sec_proto-reg" format="default"/> instruct the IANA to register the three new values TCP/DTLS/BFCP, UDP/BFCP, and UDP/TLS/BFCP for the SDP 'proto' field. The new section (<xref target="sec_bfcp-version-attr" format="default"/>) registers a new SDP "bfcpver" attribute. The rest is unchanged from <xref target="RFC4582" format="default"/>.]</li>
      </ul>
      <section anchor="sec_proto-reg" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of SDP 'proto' Values</name>
        <t>The IANA is requested to register the following values for the SDP 'proto' field under the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters registry:</t>
        <table anchor="tab_proto-iana" align="center">
          <name>Values for the SDP 'proto' field</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Value</th>
              <th align="center">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TCP/BFCP</td>
              <td align="center">RFC XXXX</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TCP/DTLS/BFCP</td>
              <td align="center">RFC XXXX</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TCP/TLS/BFCP</td>
              <td align="center">RFC XXXX</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">UDP/BFCP</td>
              <td align="center">RFC XXXX</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">UDP/TLS/BFCP</td>
              <td align="center">RFC XXXX</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of the SDP 'floorctrl' Attribute</name>
        <t>
        This document defines the SDP attribute,'floorctrl'.
        The details of the attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_floorctrl-attr" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of the SDP 'confid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
        This document defines the SDP attribute,'confid'.
        The details of the attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_confid-attr" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of the SDP 'userid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
        This document defines the SDP attribute,'userid'.
        The details of the attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_userid-attr" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of the SDP 'floorid' Attribute</name>
        <t>
        This document defines the SDP attribute,'floorid'.
        The details of the attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_floorid-attr" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registration of the SDP 'bfcpver' Attribute</name>
        <t>
        This document defines the SDP attribute,'bfcpver'.
        The details of the attribute are defined in <xref target="sec_bfcp-version-attr" format="default"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_changes" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Changes from RFC 4583</name>
      <t>Following is the list of technical changes and other fixes from <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t>Main purpose of this work was to add signaling support necessary to support BFCP over unreliable transport, as described in <xref target="BFCP" format="default"/>, resulting in the following changes:</t>
      <ol spacing="normal" type="1">
        <li>
          <t>Fields in the 'm' line (<xref target="sec_m-line" format="default"/>):</t>
          <t>
          This section is rewritten to remove reference to the exclusivity of
	  TCP as a transport for BFCP streams. The proto field values
	  TCP/DTLS/BFCP, UDP/BFCP, and UDP/TLS/BFCP are added.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Security Considerations (<xref target="sec_security" format="default"/>):</t>
          <t>
          For the DTLS-over-UDP case, mention existing considerations and requirements for the offer/answer exchange in <xref target="SDP-Offer-Answer" format="default"/>.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Registration of SDP 'proto' Values (<xref target="sec_proto-reg" format="default"/>):</t>
          <t>
          Register the three new values TCP/DTLS/BFCP, UDP/BFCP and UDP/TLS/BFCP in the SDP parameters registry.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>BFCP Version Negotiation (<xref target="sec_bfcp-version-attr" format="default"/>):</t>
          <t>
          A new 'bfcpver' SDP media-level attribute is added in order to signal supported version number.</t>
        </li>
      </ol>
      <t>In addition to the changes associated with support of BFCP over unreliable transport, the possibility for an endpoint to act as both floor control client and floor control server at the same time has
    been removed. An endpoint will now take the same role for all BFCP-controlled streams associated with the BFCP stream.</t>
      <t>Clarification and bug fixes:</t>
      <ol spacing="normal" type="1">
        <li>
          <t>Errata ID: 712 (Sections <xref target="sec_server-determination" format="counter"/> and <xref target="sec_oa-offer-answer-proc" format="counter"/>):</t>
          <t>
          Language clarification. Don't use terms like an SDP attribute is "used in an 'm' line", instead make clear that the attribute is a media-level attribute.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Fix typo in example (<xref target="sec_example" format="default"/>):</t>
          <t>
          Do not use 'm-stream' in the SDP example, use the correct 'mstrm' as specified in <xref target="sec_example" format="default"/>. Recommend interpreting 'm-stream' if it is received, since it is present in some implementations.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Assorted clarifications (Across the document):</t>
          <t>
          Language clarifications as a result of reviews. Also, the normative language where tightened where appropriate, i.e. changed from <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> strength to <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> in a number of places.</t>
        </li>
      </ol>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec_acks" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>Joerg Ott, Keith Drage, Alan Johnston, Eric Rescorla, Roni Even, and Oscar Novo provided useful ideas for the original <xref target="RFC4583" format="default"/>. The authors also acknowledge contributions to the revision of BFCP for use over an unreliable transport from Geir Arne Sandbakken, Charles Eckel, Alan Ford, Eoin McLeod, and Mark Thompson. Useful and important final reviews were done by Ali C. Begen, Mary Barnes, and Charles Eckel. In the final stages, Roman Shpount made a considerable effort in adding proper ICE support and considerations.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
            <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
            <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="S. Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="1997" month="March"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5234" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234">
          <front>
            <title>Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5234"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5234"/>
            <seriesInfo name="STD" value="68"/>
            <author initials="D." surname="Crocker" fullname="D. Crocker" role="editor">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="P." surname="Overell" fullname="P. Overell">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2008" month="January"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Internet technical specifications often need to define a formal syntax.  Over the years, a modified version of Backus-Naur Form (BNF), called Augmented BNF (ABNF), has been popular among many Internet specifications.  The current specification documents ABNF. It balances compactness and simplicity with reasonable representational power.  The differences between standard BNF and ABNF involve naming rules, repetition, alternatives, order-independence, and value ranges.  This specification also supplies additional rule definitions and encoding for a core lexical analyzer of the type common to several Internet specifications.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3261" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261">
          <front>
            <title>SIP: Session Initiation Protocol</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3261"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3261"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Rosenberg" fullname="J. Rosenberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="H. Schulzrinne">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="G. Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="A." surname="Johnston" fullname="A. Johnston">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Peterson" fullname="J. Peterson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="R." surname="Sparks" fullname="R. Sparks">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="M." surname="Handley" fullname="M. Handley">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="E." surname="Schooler" fullname="E. Schooler">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2002" month="June"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), an application-layer control (signaling) protocol for creating, modifying, and terminating sessions with one or more participants.  These sessions include Internet telephone calls, multimedia distribution, and multimedia conferences.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3264" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264">
          <front>
            <title>An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3264"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3264"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Rosenberg" fullname="J. Rosenberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="H. Schulzrinne">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2002" month="June"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a mechanism by which two entities can make use of the Session Description Protocol (SDP) to arrive at a common view of a multimedia session between them.  In the model, one participant offers the other a description of the desired session from their perspective, and the other participant answers with the desired session from their perspective.  This offer/answer model is most useful in unicast sessions where information from both participants is needed for the complete view of the session.  The offer/answer model is used by protocols like the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4145" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4145">
          <front>
            <title>TCP-Based Media Transport in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4145"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4145"/>
            <author initials="D." surname="Yon" fullname="D. Yon">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="G. Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2005" month="September"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how to express media transport over TCP using the Session Description Protocol (SDP).  It defines the SDP 'TCP' protocol identifier, the SDP 'setup' attribute, which describes the connection setup procedure, and the SDP 'connection' attribute, which handles connection reestablishment.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4574" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4574">
          <front>
            <title>The Session Description Protocol (SDP) Label Attribute</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4574"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4574"/>
            <author initials="O." surname="Levin" fullname="O. Levin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="G. Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="August"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines a new Session Description Protocol (SDP) media-level attribute: "label".  The "label" attribute carries a pointer to a media stream in the context of an arbitrary network application that uses SDP.  The sender of the SDP document can attach the "label" attribute to a particular media stream or streams.  The application can then use the provided pointer to refer to each particular media stream in its context.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8122" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8122">
          <front>
            <title>Connection-Oriented Media Transport over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8122"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8122"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Lennox" fullname="J. Lennox">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Holmberg" fullname="C. Holmberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2017" month="March"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies how to establish secure connection-oriented media transport sessions over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol using the Session Description Protocol (SDP).  It defines the SDP protocol identifier, 'TCP/TLS'.  It also defines the syntax and semantics for an SDP 'fingerprint' attribute that identifies the certificate that will be presented for the TLS session.  This mechanism allows media transport over TLS connections to be established securely, so long as the integrity of session descriptions is assured.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 4572 by clarifying the usage of multiple fingerprints.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4566" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566">
          <front>
            <title>SDP: Session Description Protocol</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4566"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4566"/>
            <author initials="M." surname="Handley" fullname="M. Handley">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="V." surname="Jacobson" fullname="V. Jacobson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Perkins" fullname="C. Perkins">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="July"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP).  SDP is intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of session announcement, session invitation, and other forms of multimedia session initiation.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6347" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6347">
          <front>
            <title>Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6347"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6347"/>
            <author initials="E." surname="Rescorla" fullname="E. Rescorla">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="N." surname="Modadugu" fullname="N. Modadugu">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2012" month="January"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 1.2 of the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol.  The DTLS protocol provides communications privacy for datagram protocols.  The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.  The DTLS protocol is based on the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol and provides equivalent security guarantees.  Datagram semantics of the underlying transport are preserved by the DTLS protocol.  This document updates DTLS 1.0 to work with TLS version 1.2.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4571" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4571">
          <front>
            <title>Framing Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) and RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Packets over Connection-Oriented Transport</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4571"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4571"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Lazzaro" fullname="J. Lazzaro">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="July"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines a method for framing Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) and RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) packets onto connection-oriented transport (such as TCP).  The memo also defines how session descriptions may specify RTP streams that use the framing method.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6544" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6544">
          <front>
            <title>TCP Candidates with Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6544"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6544"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Rosenberg" fullname="J. Rosenberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="A." surname="Keranen" fullname="A. Keranen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="B. B." surname="Lowekamp" fullname="B. B. Lowekamp">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="A. B." surname="Roach" fullname="A. B. Roach">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2012" month="March"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) defines a mechanism for NAT traversal for multimedia communication protocols based on the offer/answer model of session negotiation.  ICE works by providing a set of candidate transport addresses for each media stream, which are then validated with peer-to-peer connectivity checks based on Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN).  ICE provides a general framework for describing candidates but only defines UDP-based media streams. This specification extends ICE to TCP-based media, including the ability to offer a mix of TCP and UDP-based candidates for a single stream.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4582" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4582">
          <front>
            <title>The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4582"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4582"/>
            <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="G. Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Ott" fullname="J. Ott">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="K." surname="Drage" fullname="K. Drage">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="November"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Floor control is a means to manage joint or exclusive access to shared resources in a (multiparty) conferencing environment. Thereby, floor control complements other functions -- such as conference and media session setup, conference policy manipulation, and media control -- that are realized by other protocols.</t>
              <t>This document specifies the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP). BFCP is used between floor participants and floor control servers, and between floor chairs (i.e., moderators) and floor control servers.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4583" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4583">
          <front>
            <title>Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4583"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4583"/>
            <author initials="G." surname="Camarillo" fullname="G. Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="November"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies how to describe Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) streams in Session Description Protocol (SDP) descriptions. User agents using the offer/answer model to establish BFCP streams use this format in their offers and answers.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
            <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
            <author initials="B." surname="Leiba" fullname="B. Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2017" month="May"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8445" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8445">
          <front>
            <title>Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8445"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8445"/>
            <author initials="A." surname="Keranen" fullname="A. Keranen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Holmberg" fullname="C. Holmberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Rosenberg" fullname="J. Rosenberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2018" month="July"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) traversal for UDP-based communication.  This protocol is called Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE).  ICE makes use of the Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) protocol and its extension, Traversal Using Relay NAT (TURN).</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 5245.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-24.txt">
          <front>
            <title>Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer procedures for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="Work in Progress," value="draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-24"/>
            <author initials="M" surname="Petit-Huguenin" fullname="Marc Petit-Huguenin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="S" surname="Nandakumar" fullname="Suhas Nandakumar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="A" surname="Keranen" fullname="Ari Keranen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="November" day="9" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/ Answer procedures for carrying out Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) between the agents.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="BFCP" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16.txt">
          <front>
            <title>The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="Work in Progress," value="draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16"/>
            <author initials="G" surname="Camarillo" fullname="Gonzalo Camarillo">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="K" surname="Drage" fullname="Keith Drage">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="T" surname="Kristensen" fullname="Tom Kristensen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J" surname="Ott" fullname="Joerg Ott">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C" surname="Eckel" fullname="Charles Eckel">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="November" day="13" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Floor control is a means to manage joint or exclusive access to shared resources in a (multiparty) conferencing environment. Thereby, floor control complements other functions -- such as conference and media session setup, conference policy manipulation, and media control -- that are realized by other protocols.  This document specifies the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP). BFCP is used between floor participants and floor control servers, and between floor chairs (i.e., moderators) and floor control servers.  This document obsoletes RFC 4582.  Changes from RFC 4582 are summarized in Section 16.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="SDP-Offer-Answer" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-32.txt">
          <front>
            <title>Session Description Protocol (SDP) Offer/Answer Considerations for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) and Transport Layer Security (TLS)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="Work in Progress," value="draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-32"/>
            <author initials="C" surname="Holmberg" fullname="Christer Holmberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="R" surname="Shpount" fullname="Roman Shpount">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" day="29" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer/ answer procedures for negotiating and establishing a Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) association.  The document also defines the criteria for when a new DTLS association must be established.  The document updates RFC 5763 and RFC 7345, by replacing common SDP offer/answer procedures with a reference to this specification.  This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute, 'tls-id'.  This document also defines how the 'tls-id' attribute can be used for negotiating and establishing a Transport Layer Security (TLS) connection, in conjunction with the procedures in RFC 4145 and RFC 8122.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-17.txt">
          <front>
            <title>A Framework for SDP Attributes when Multiplexing</title>
            <seriesInfo name="Work in Progress," value="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-17"/>
            <author initials="S" surname="Nandakumar" fullname="Suhas Nandakumar">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" day="28" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The purpose of this specification is to provide a framework for analyzing the multiplexing characteristics of Session Description Protocol (SDP) attributes when SDP is used to negotiate the usage of single 5-tuple for sending and receiving media associated with multiple media descriptions.  This specification also categorizes the existing SDP attributes based on the framework described herein.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informational References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC5576" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5576">
          <front>
            <title>Source-Specific Media Attributes in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5576"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5576"/>
            <author initials="J." surname="Lennox" fullname="J. Lennox">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Ott" fullname="J. Ott">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="T." surname="Schierl" fullname="T. Schierl">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date year="2009" month="June"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Session Description Protocol (SDP) provides mechanisms to describe attributes of multimedia sessions and of individual media streams (e.g., Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) sessions) within a multimedia session, but does not provide any mechanism to describe individual media sources within a media stream.  This document defines a mechanism to describe RTP media sources, which are identified by their synchronization source (SSRC) identifiers, in SDP, to associate attributes with these sources, and to express relationships among sources.  It also defines several source-level attributes that can be used to describe properties of media sources.   [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="SDP-Bundle" target="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-53.txt">
          <front>
            <title>Negotiating Media Multiplexing Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)</title>
            <seriesInfo name="Work in Progress," value="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-53"/>
            <author initials="C" surname="Holmberg" fullname="Christer Holmberg">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="H" surname="Alvestrand" fullname="Harald Alvestrand">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C" surname="Jennings" fullname="Cullen Jennings">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" day="20" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This specification defines a new Session Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping Framework extension, 'BUNDLE'.  The extension can be used with the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism to negotiate the usage of a single transport (5-tuple) for sending and receiving media described by multiple SDP media descriptions ("m=" sections).  Such transport is referred to as a BUNDLE transport, and the media is referred to as bundled media.  The "m=" sections that use the BUNDLE transport form a BUNDLE group.  This specification updates RFC 3264, to also allow assigning a zero port value to a "m=" section in cases where the media described by the "m=" section is not disabled or rejected.  This specification defines a new RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) source description (SDES) item and a new RTP header extension that can be used to correlate bundled RTP/RTCP packets with their appropriate "m=" section.  This specification updates RFC 7941, by adding an exception, for the MID RTP header extension, to the requirement regarding protection of an SDES RTP header extension carrying an SDES item for the MID RTP header extension.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
