Subject: [6lo] FW: 6lo Applicability Document Discussion

From: Samita Chakrabarti <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:11:05 +0000

FYI: Summary of 6lo Applicability document discussion. [ Please see below forwarded message]
================================================

Thanks to Yong-Geun all the WG attendees who were present in the meeting and contributed to the very productive discussion.

There was a rough consensus among the attendees at May 19th meeting on the new name of the document aligning with its purpose:

“IPv6 over Constrained Node Networks(6lo)  Applicability & Use cases”

A new revision of the draft will be expected before IETF96.

Thanks,
-Samita

From: Samita Chakrabarti
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:57 PM
To: 'Yong-Geun Hong'
Cc: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>; Thomas Watteyne ([email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>); AbdurRashidSangi ([email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>); Xavier Vilajosana; 최영환; Daniel Migault
Subject: RE: 6lo Applicability Document Discussion

Thank you Younhwan for taking the notes.

====

As for the summary to WG we can do the following based on the meetings and discussion:

Attendees: Samita, Yong-Guen, Thomas, Gomez, Younghwan, rashid, Xavier, Daniel

- Yong-Guen's presented an overview, history and quick intro to the I-D, draft-hong-6lo-use-case.
  Young-Geun requested to get the following questions to be resolved:
           . what is the main purpose?
           . title changes to what?
           . additional sections and parts in doc.

·         Need to decide on the new title of the draft reflecting  purpose and content – Young-Geun to discuss and decide in a group of interested 6lo participants

·         Should we describe  deployment in this document?

o   Concern over distinguishing itself from existing 6lowpan Usecase RFC

o   Some folks see value in describing current deployment with figures (Carles, Samita, and previously M. Richardson)

o   Young-Geun to seek contribution on 6lo deployment high-level diagram, scale, Applications and L2 technolgies

o   Possible deployment examples: Smart Grid activity in WiSun?  6Tisch area?

o   However the document’s main focus is on per-L2 technology usage, adaptation parameters

·         Clarification of the purpose of the document

o   Informational RFC

o   Targeting IETF internal WGs and members as well as external SDO contemplating a L3 solution for their respective L2 constrained node networks

·         Should the document include LPWAN as a usecase? [ IETF95 comments from Sandra ]

o   6lowpan can be used definitely on LPWAN with some modification  but the consensus in the team is to wait until LPWAN BOF next time

o   Wait until later revision of the document

·         What about Security requirement of the usecase scenarios?

o   Should this be considered for each usecase or in general ?

o   Young-Geun has taken this as an AI

==

Please check and let me know if any summary point is missing. After that I can post the summary in the mailing list.
Thanks,
-Samita