Subject: [71attendees] IPv4 outage: a warning

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:49:51 -0400

[Sent on the GNSO GA mailing list by a known troll. Resent here just
for the fun.]

Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:

>All,
>
>In regards to transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 a "Trial by fire"
>for some if not most users will start this evening.  Our members
>whom are protected from outage via NAT's, will not largely be
>negatively impacted.  Other, and likely most users will experience
>outage or loss of connectivity to the Internet unless their service
>provider hasn't implemented to IPv6.
>
>  I have to wonder if and why DOC authorized this test...
>
>See:
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/031208-ipv6-ietf.html?netht=ts_031208&nladname=031208dailynewspmal
>
>Regards,
>
>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
>very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
>liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>===============================================================
>Updated 1/26/04
>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
>div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
>[email-masked]
>My Phone: 214-244-4827
>  
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees