Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for October 9, 2008 Telechat

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:59:21 +0200

Please find below the preliminary agenda of the 10/9 IESG telechat. Note
that I will be on vacation 10/7 to 10/21 and I will not attend the
telechat, so please send your comments and concerns to Ron until 10/8
COB the latest. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
IESG Secretary

2. Protocol Actions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
	reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the
Internet
	infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-avt-rtp-toffset-07.txt
    Transmission Time offsets in RTP streams (Proposed Standard) - 1 of
6

    Note: Tom Taylor is the PROTO Shepherd 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-sipping-race-examples-06.txt
    Example calls flows of race conditions in the Session Initiation
Protocol 
    (SIP) (BCP) - 2 of 6 
    Token: Jon Peterson
  o draft-ietf-forces-model-15.txt
    ForCES Forwarding Element Model (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-specification-13.txt
    CAPWAP Protocol Specification (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-10.txt
    CAPWAP Protocol Binding for IEEE 802.11 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6

    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g711wb-03.txt
    RTP Payload Format for ITU-T Recommendation G.711.1 (Proposed
Standard) - 6 
    of 6 
    Note: Roni Even is the document shepherd. 
    Token: Cullen Jennings

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-bryant-mpls-tp-jwt-report-00.txt
    JWT Report on MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport
Profile 
    (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: David Ward

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
  o draft-santoni-timestampeddata-04.txt
    Syntax for binding documents with time stamps (Informational) - 1 of
2
 
    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-templin-autoconf-dhcp-16.txt
    MANET Autoconfiguration using Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) 
    (Informational) - 2 of 2 
    Token: Ross Callon

3.3.3 For Action
  o draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt
    PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link
Metrics

    (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Russ Housley

_______________________________________________
AAA-DOCTORS mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aaa-doctors