Subject: Re: [alto] Submitting draft-wu-alto-te-metrics as a WG item

From: Mirja Kühlewind <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:01:41 +0100

Hi all,

sorry for being super late.

One thing is to align with IPPM, there other question is do we need an own alto registry for these metric or can we use the IPPM registry? I would prefer the second approach if appropriate which would also mean that the other metrics that are not part of the IPPM registry yet, should be registered there. Given this is still work in progress, we definitely should coordinate with the IPPM working group and see if the registration itself should happen in IPPM or ALTO.

Mirja

> Am 29.08.2016 um 21:36 schrieb Vijay K. Gurbani <[email-masked]>:
> 
> On 08/29/2016 03:47 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
>> Here is the update of draft-wu-alto-te-metrics to address two open
>> issues raised in the last meeting. The diff is:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-09
> 
> Qin: Thanks.  More below.
> 
> Folks: Please take a look at the above diffs that address the concerns
> in [1].
> 
> Authors: Please wait a few days for any feedback from the WG and
> incorporate feedback in a -00 version.  Irrespective of any feedback,
> please generate a WG -00 and submit by next week (mid- to late next
> week).
> 
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03277.html
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - vijay
> -- 
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
> Email: [email-masked] / [email-masked]
> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto