Subject: [alto] Review of draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses-00

From: Yichen Qian <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:33:33 +0800

Hi Sabine and ALTO working group,

I just reviewed draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses-00 and below are my comments. Most of them are about the examples given in the draft.

At the begin of section 3, 'The predent draft proposed …' -> 'The present draft proposed …'.

In section 3.2, MNC is defined as a 2-3 digits decimal number without leading zeros. It’s not consistent with the example below 'MNC value 020 stands for Network N2 …'.

Section 3.2 also mentions that ECI is a 7 digits lower-case hex number. While in the third example of section 3.4, 'ecgi:311.481:123480' and 'ecgi:311.481:12348d' only have 6 digits for ECI. 

Another confusion in the third example of section 3.4 is that I think 'ecgi:311.481:12348d' also matches the ECI that starts with the 18 bits 0x12348.

Your feedback is highly appreciated.

Best regards,
Yichen