Subject: Re: [ANCP] draft-wadhwa-gsmp-l2control-configuration-02.txt to WG ID?

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:59:09 +0000

Folks,

I think there is consensus that this document should move forward as a
working group draft.

However, I would also like authors to please consider the comments in the
San Diego meeting that the specific requirements text in this document
should be removed. Reference should be made to the framework draft
(draft-ietf-ancp-framework-00.txt) for these.

Also, when you submit the new WG ID, please ensure that the draft name
reflects the WG e.g. draft-ietf-ancp-l2control-configuration-00.txt

Best regards,

Matthew

Matthew BOCCI/GB/ALCATEL@ALCATEL wrote on 09/11/2006 23:26:50:

> During the ANCP meeting in San Diego we asked whether the ANCP protocol
> draft (draft-wadhwa-gsmp-l2control-configuration-02.txt ) should become a
> working group ID.
>
> Please indicate to the list whether or not you support this draft
becoming
> a working group ID.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ANCP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp

_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp