Subject: Re: [apps-review] [apps-discuss] APPS Area review: draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs

From: SM <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:13:46 -0800

Hi Murray,
At 01:06 26-11-2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs
>Title: Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts
>Reviewer: Murray S. Kucherawy
>Review Date: November 25-26, 2011

Thanks for doing the review.

>3) Is Section 5.6 necessary?  If A6 records were already busted to 
>Experimental, it seems like this gives them needless attention.  To 
>that end, perhaps this document (or a different one from v6ops) 
>should declare A6 Historic.

There was a discussion [1] in the DNSEXT WG about moving A6 resource 
records to Historic.

Best regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14615.html