Subject: Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

From: "Lautenschlaeger, Wolfram (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:17:38 +0000

Hi Roland,

Yes, of course, I am still interested in finishing the GSP draft.
If you have new results on GSP, we could finally take the long pending "independent opinion" hurdle, thank you.
If there is still some interest in the tsvwg, we could make a trial. My co-author Andrea Francini of the corresponding GSP paper (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7483103/)  could contribute as well. 

Regards
Wolfram

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Bless [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:36 PM
To: [email-masked]; Lautenschlaeger, Wolfram (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) <[email-masked]>
Subject: Status of the GSP AQM?

Hi folks,

I was wondering what happened to the GSP AQM proposal (draft-lauten-aqm-gsp see (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lauten-aqm-gsp).
Discussion seems to have ended after IETF 93 and we probably missed the point of discussing WG adoption.
IMHO this AQM should also be documented as RFC. It performs extremely well in some settings (better than CoDel or PIE) and its implementation complexity is also lower. Wolfram, are you interested in finishing this?
Should we continue in tsvwg?

Regards,
 Roland