Subject: Re: [Asrg] define spam

From: "Jon Kyme" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:11:54 +0000

>>Well (referring to the charter) how about:
>>A communication for which there is no consent given by the intended
>>recipient.
>
>
>Hmmn.  Is this message spam?  I don't have any consent from you on
>file.

The message of of itself fits the definition. However, it has a context (is
part of an ongoing communication with a list - and within the declared
ambit of the list) such that it's probably not reasonable to consider it
"spam".

Next!

:-)

>
>Regards,
>John Levine, [email-masked], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
>Dummies",
>Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer
>Commissioner
>"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
>
>

--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg