Subject: Re: [atoca] geo-specificity.

From: "Thomson, Martin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:31:40 +0800

Thanks Tony,

The Beidou slide set was particularly interesting.  I'm now going to have to see if a similar capability is likely to be possible for GPS (though not in L1) and Galileo.

Also of interest to this group.  Atom + CAP is being deployed:

http://www.ga.gov.au/earthquakes/staticPageController.do?page=eq-notification-service

--Martin

On 2011-07-29 at 02:38:01, Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> A good overview of geolocation tagging needs and mechanisms can be 
> gleaned from the April global CAP implementers workshop hosted by the 
> WMO http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/ISS/Meetings/WIS-
> CAP_Geneva2011/DocPlan.html
> 
> At the event, clever geo-tagging implementations by both Beidou and 
> Google were described.
> 
> The use of OIDs for some of these purposes in the allotted alerting 
> arc
> 2.49 and in conjunction with the DNS based OID resolution system was 
> also described there.  Because OIDs are also embedded in digital certs 
> and network elements, they can be further exploited for needed 
> geotagging.
> 
> --tony
> 
> On 7/28/2011 11:53 AM, Mark wrote:
> > The more geo specific a message is, the more utility is has, 
> > especially down to very local jurisdictional levels where, which 
> > side
> of the street matters.
> > Since a CAP message has a polygon with it, there is not much problem 
> > in using that as a very specific geo location parameter.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atoca mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/atoca