Subject: Confirm Settlement Receipt Id 52-9646

From: Terminate: Tax Collections <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:13:09 -0700

What are you Options if you cant pay your taxes?

In a recent article, these options were released:

- Option #1: Don't File (Bad Choice)
	- If you didn't file last year either, the IRS is probably looking for you
	
- Option #2: Take out a Loan ( Then you'll owe interest)
	- No special loan for this, your at the mercy of others
	
* OPTION #3: Accept this IRS Settlement 

	* View Settlement for Atompub-archive here: / http://www.pastutmy.com/accept/debt/settlement/package/irs.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* it's important to find a way to deal with your tax debt is that if you don't pay what you owe,
the IRS may file a Notice of Federal Tax Lien. Tax liens are reported on your credit reports, 
and they are one of the most negative types of information that can be reported * 

Your credit score can drop significantly as a result.

Please Confirm Upon Receipt >> http://www.pastutmy.com/accept/debt/settlement/package/irs.html

Regards, 

- Urgent Info Services

to modify notification settings w/ Urgent Info Services 
write - 3205 Lake Sarah- Independence, MN 5 5 3 5 9
or http://www.pastutmy.com/k3jr/skgj93/gni4.dngi4

Class<SampleEnum> clazz = SampleEnum.class;
String[] fieldNames = {
    "ONE", "ENUM$VALUES"
};
//create a weak reference to the instance
WeakReference<SampleEnum> ref = new WeakReference<SampleEnum>(SampleEnum.ONE);
//remove the hard referencesfor (String fieldName: fieldNames) Field feld = clazz.getDeclaredField(fieldName);
Field modifiersField = Field.class.getDeclaredField("modifiers");
modifiersField.setAccessible(true);modifiersField.setInt(feld, feld.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL);
feld.setAccessible(true);feld.set(null, null);
}/wait until a gc occurs and clears the weak ref
while (ref.get() != null) { System.out.println("Waitin");System.gc();t is a compile-time error for an enum declaration to declare a finalizer.
That's clear enough. I don't know why that would be the case, but the rules are the rules. This also appears to be enforced by the fact that enums derive from Enum, and the API spec says that Enum has a final finalizer.
An instance of an enum type may never be finalized.
The language here seems ambiguous to me. Are they declaring that no instance of an enum type will ever be finalized? If so, why "may"? Why not just say so? Are they just reminding us that finalization isn't guaranteed to occur? Either way, it doesn't matter.Object's finalize method is defined to do nothing (12.6).  Enum derives from Object, and enums derive from Enum.  Enum's finalizer isn't defined to do anything, and you can't override it, so when you put it all together the finalization of an enum instance has no effects.In my interpretation, the enum instances can be garbage collected (although as others have pointed out the circumstances that allow this to happen are a bit unusual), and as their finalize method is defined not to do anything, whether or not the finalize method is ever called is a moot point.
@MaxMommersteeg sometimes it is usefull and clear to not creates tens of voids for switch   Brans Ds yesterday
@MaxMommersteeg. It appears the OP is attempting to create a switch fall-thru which has to be done using the goto statement in C#. In C/C++ you don't need the goto for a fall-thru. Also, consider why "goto considered harmful" in the first place - it's because it can lead to spagetti code in un structured code.   user2425056 yesterday
3	  	
@MaxMommersteeg, Do You have a link to some reference about the poor performance of goto in C#?   user2425056 yesterday
4	  	
@MaxMommersteeg: goto within switch is only mentioned in the end of that article. It refers to a separate article about goto in switch on the same site, which starts with the explanation "Goto is used inside switch. This can enhance performance and reduce code size in some cases." (emphasis by myself)   O. R. Map