Subject: its not too late

From: Consumer Reports Online <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:36:43 -0700

Greetings Atompub-archive

Vehicle service agreements (also known as extended warranty plans) are designed to offer 
similar peace of mind by literally extending the length of time a customer 
can expect to receive such coverage.

Be proactive in order to save out of pocket expenses.

View Policy -> http://www.stoptablet.com/extend/warranty/alert.index
May 30, 2014

--------------------------------------
- Protect Yourself...And your Wallet
- Extended Warranty Package Generated

We hope you enjoyed this warranty update.
if you want to stop further info from Update Notice Messages
visit http://www.stoptablet.com/o93jf.snfe - or - 118 Kecks Lane
Ruff Dale, Pennsylvania 15679

How is the sed suggestion better? This seems to be the most simple answer of them all and requires installing nothing. Can any sort of pattern matching be done here? Wildcards, Regex et"How is the sed suggestion better?" - sed and similar utilities operate on files; this snippet omits the important step of reading lines from the input file and writing to the output file, while ensuring that any special characters in the file are handled correctly.   @Joe Wrong. You can pipe any output to sed, files are not necessa@Asad, yes that's true, the OP was asking about files, but in fact it works with streams which don't have to be files. But my point here is that this answer is flawed, since it omits reading/writing from a stream and handling any special characters@Bill how to use variable as a replacing text? ie. I have value in a variable and a string which has some delimter. set str=%str:"##"=%varValue%% doesn't work. Any workarounds? I have to question the usefulness of a code snippet si
 te whose terms of use prohibit copying any of the code (You may not distribute any information provided under the domain dostips.com in any form without express written permission of the domain owner.).  I agree their terms are confusing, they also say "The information provided under the domain dostips.com is hopefully useful" so my assumption is that they are happy for people to copy the code to solve a problem. I'm not sure I have ever read any terms and conditions and been happyThis is great. I love answers that don't involve downloading something else to do it. I also like solutions that don't involve external utilities, unfortunately, I keep getting "find: invalid predicate `'" when I try to run this batch. Don't really have the time to debug it right now. The "find: invalid predicate `'" error was due to an external 'find' utility on my system. Once removed, this worked fine.Don't store your password in plain text. As of Git 1.7.9 you can use credential helpers. git config --g
 lobal credential.helper osxkeychain on OS X. For other OS see set-up-git   @dazonic: thanks for pointing out that new feature - I've updated my answer to suggest thatFWIW, the osx keychain stuff is part of base GIT source code, it's not an exclusive component of Brew or MacPorts or whatever the flavor of the month is. And you don't even need to build git from scratch - just cd hain/ and run make.FWIW credential.cache settings don't work in windows see is the osxkeychain only for https repos urls? or does it work also when using ssh repos urls + keys?   chovy Oct 29 '13 at 22:52 
With two factor authentication you have to use what github calls a Person Access Token. In fact you should always use one, as unlike a password you can control what access it gives. Just replace the password in the url so you end up with It makes plain text passwords stored on disk almost safe enough to use.   Russell Stuart Apr @chovy The osxkeychain credential helper is unnecessary if you're using ssh. Instead, you can use ssh-agent. If you're using a Linux desktop or OS X, the keyring should automatically pick up the ssh key passphrase for you (you may need to run ssh-add). Windows can use Pageant if you have PuTTY. If you're using Linux in a headless environment, there's a little more set up required, but you can easily find a guide on
You can check your remotes with the command: git remote -v and then if it's not correct, you can use: git remote rm aliasname (like "origin" for ex.) and re-add using: git remote aagain like mentioned here, the https style remote will not use your SSH keys.   another way to change this is to edityour repo. edit the url under [remote "origin"] to use the l instead os What's wrong with using https againThis worked for me, having teh same username/password prompting problem. Note that "username" is your github username and "repo.git" is the name of your repo (I did not include the ".git" on the end, and that still worked for me). The remainder was entered verbatim.   Jason Jul 24 '12 at 15:12
  	  	
Issuing git remote -v with the same issue returned origin  After fixing the problem it returns origin c

If you use Cookie as a better replacement for HTTP Basic Auth you can do truly stateless authentication with a method for expiring the authentication and ability to logout. An example implementation could use cookie called Emulated-HTTP-Basic-Auth with similar value to real HTTP Basic Auth and in addition set expire time. Log out can then be implemented with removing that cookie. I'd guess that any client able to support HTTP Basic Auth can also support cookie authentication done this way.  @MikkoRantalainen But this cookie will still be managed by the server, as I wrote. It is some kind of stateless, but not "pure" stateless. In all cases, you need JavaScript code dedicated to client login/logout, which is perfectly possible e.g. with HTTP Digest Auth - good idea, but no big benefit, here, to reinvent the wheel.   I would claim that server implements the UI and logic for configuring the header but the header itself is stateless. A client designed for the API could skip using server 
 help for configuring the header and just pass the required information similar to HTTP Basic Auth. My point is that common UAs (browsers) have such a poor implementation of Basic Auth that it cannot be used. A server provided emulation for the same stuff in another header (Cookie) can be used instead. Of course, the server could support accepting both HTTP Basic Auth and Cookie. However, try to never request HTTP Basic Auth from a browser to avoid the bad UI. 
 @graffic In fact, this is what my answer proposed: even if sessions may be nothey are very handy and could/should be used with not fear. My point was thatprocess should not be tied to HTTP specific patterns, like cookies or HTTP authentication.  we implemented a light but powerful session management over REST authentication, without being bound to HTTP. See the last paragraph of my answer.On the Query Authentication: (From the link you gave, credits @ Ron Wail ) "I don't agree with authentication information in the URL because it's the wrong place for it. URLs name resources, the HTTP headers are where things like authentication, content negotiation etc are supposed to be. Just because people have misunderstood REST as a style and insist on imposing RPC-like approaches via the URL doesn't mean that we should" + you lose caching and proxying. I couldn't agree moreNone of these solutions is trul Every single one requires some client specific state be kept on the server. Why is there s
 uch widespread misunderstanding of REST? @jcoffland You are right: "pure" s not authentication-friendly, by design. AFAIR a cookie can be implemented without any server-side state, just like Query Authentication. But it will probably make it less secure and convenient than some "light" server-side session. Perfectly statelessness (a is not a solution for all use cases IMHO.   Arnahow about digest instead of basic?   t won't change the problem: weird dialog popup to input the user/password credentials, then unsafe request to the server (digest is sensitive to MIM and Replay aIt is just a little better than basic, since the password is hashed during the transmission. This is why basic is still used a lot here, since it is easier to implement, an