Subject: build ... price and drive

From: Auto Dealers Association Clearance <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 08:46:58 -0700

Automotive Digest - May 2014
=============================

Now's the time to select a 2014 model - Dealerships clearing lots

You can find a better deal on a 2014 model... Then on a used vehicle with s below KBB Value

Updated list of 2014's that must go
-> http://www.dakscience.com/auto/cleance/inventory/updated.index

As of May 20th, 2014 Available Incentives: 0 Down, 0% APR, 1,000 Bonus ,
View Complete list of Incentives - http://www.dakscience.com/auto/cleance/inventory/updated.index 
* we can not guarantee all incentives 

send message settings requests - Alert System Notifications
1 1 0 7-Valeria Drive-Marion, TX 78124 or http://www.dakscience.com/390j/sngo349.sjo44t

+1, I recently had some really huge xml files (+1 gigabyte) that I needed to look at. I'm on windows and both vim, emacs, notepad++ and several other editors completely choked on the file to the point where my system almost became unusable when trying to open the file. After a while I realized how unnecessary it was to actually attempt to open the file in an -editor- when I just needed to -view- it. Using cygwin (and some clever grep/less/sed-magic) I easily found the part I was interested in and could read it without any hassle.   wasatz Apr 23 '10 at 11:56cygwin's less works for viewing a file > 2GB sweet   rogerdpack Sep 20 '11 at 16:28you don't need cygwin for less, you can also use it under windows:I couldn't figure out how to edit files with less but after getting the taste I used vim to edit a bulky JSON object which made the other editors (Brackets, Textmate <- note I'm running on OS X) throw up.   yoshi Dec 18 '12 at 10:15This XML editor here has also a large file viewer com
 ponent and does provide syntax coloring also for huge files. The files are not loaded completely into memory so a multi-GB document shouldn't be a problem. In addition this tool can also validate those big XML documents ... In my opinion one of the best approaches to work with huge XML data.   lichtfusion Apr 21 '13 at 12:38Stop downgrade users to the command line tools, prefer to upgrade softwares to human users (i.e. with easy interface).   SOne thing is how big files your editor can edit theoretically. But another thing is, is it fast enough to realistically edit that file.

Most editors use the easy way and simply load the whole file in memory. This means that you can not edit files larger than the largest  memory block. This gets even worse if the editor converts ASCII file into Unicode, which doubles the size. With editors like this, just opening the file may take several minutes. But even if you can load the file, any editing operations may be so slow that you really can not do anything.

For editing huge files, VEDIT (non ) is the best choice. It is marketed as the fastest editor on Earth, and it is probably true. In addition, VEDIT uses very little of memory and does not create huge tmp files no matter how big files you are editing. The standard (32-bit) version of VEDIT can edit files up to 2 GB (but you can edit larger files by using the built-in splitter function). VEDIT Pro64 can directly handle files of any size.

UltraEdit is OK, too, but it is not as fast as VEDIT and you may need to change configuration and sacrifice backup and undo for editing large files.If you just want to View the file, V File Viewer is an excellent tool, I opened an 8.5GB file with it earlier today. I have to say, I've been doing some searching today for a text editor which will handle what I call "Large" files and so far all the applications I've tried have choked. It makes me laugh to see people describing 100MB files as "Large". I deal with alot of data, clients will send me a flat text file with their entire say an entire transaction database covering a year or more of transactions and that sort of thing. I regularly deal with file sizes of over 2Gb, and right now am looking at a text file which as I said is 8.5 Gb, but which is mostly crap I'm not interested in. Anyone know of anything that will handle that? As to why would I want to? Well, we frequently get data provided to us with high/low ascii characters embed
 ded which cause our data processing program (SAS) to fail to read the data in (such as end of file characters or embedded line feed characters etc). In order to fix this, I usually open the data in a text editor and strip the special chars out.

I just opened (copy of) my Outlook .pst file (297 MB) on VEDIT. Opening the file took approximately 0.1 seconds Searching for a string that was found near the end of file took 8.0 sec in normal mode and 1.1 sec in read-only mode. Inserting and deleting characters were instantenous, as was undo. Saving the file took 11 seconds.

Opening the same file to Ultraedit took 9.8 sec in normal mode and about 1.0 sec if tmp files were disabled. Searching took 11.5 sec (using read-only mode did not have effect on this). Inserting and deleting characters were instantenous, but undo a single character insert took 26 seconds. Saving the file took 16 seconds.

I tried to open the file in Notepad, but it crashed (probably because the file is binary). Opening a 92 MB text file took 3 minutes.

Attempt to load the file on Eclipse default editor caused error "out of java heap space". The same happened even with the 92 MB file.Ordinarily, I use GNU Emacs (v23) for text editing or light coding. But I have to admit GNU Emacs sucks when it comes to large, huge, gigantic files: you have to configure and compile it yourself to edit file in the magnitute of megabytes, but even if you do, it's not really recommended. For large files, in text mode GNU Emacs is sluggish at best and sometimes hang; in hex-mode, it almost always hang (and I resort to gvim + xxd for hexediting not-so-large files, and dedicated hex editors for really-large files). I guess this is not some particularity with my computer but some design issues (feature? bug?) with GNU Emacs.1) If you have installed python 3.4 or later, pip is included with python and should already be working on your system.

2) If you are running a version below python 3.4 or if pip was not installed with python 3.4 for some reason, then you'd probably use pip's official installation script get-pip.py. The pip installer now grabs setuptools for you, and works regardless of architecture (32bit or 64bit).

The installation instructions are detailed here and involve:
For Windows editions of the 64 bit variety - 64bit windows + python used to require a separate installation method due to ez_setup, but I've tested the new distribute method on 64bit windows running 32bit python and 64bit python, and you can now use the same method for all versions of windows/python 2.7X:

OLD Method 2 using distribute:

Download distribute - I threw mine in C:\Python27\Scripts (feel  to create a Scripts directory if it doesn't exist.
Open up a command prompt (on windows you should check out conemu2 if you don't use powershell) and change (cd) to the directory you've downloaded distribute_setup.py to.
Run distribute_setup: python distribute_setup.py (This will not work if your python installation directory is not added to your path - go here for help)
Change the current directory to the Scripts directory for your python installation (C:\Python27\Scripts) or add that directory, as well as the python base installation directory to your %PATH% environment variable.
Install pip using the newly installed setuptools: easy_install pip
The last step will not work unless you're either in the directory easy_install.exe is located in(C:\Python27\Scripts would be the default for python 2.7), or you have that directory added to your path.
To install or upgrade pip, securely download get-pip.py.
o the install is easyinstall, then pip, then virtualenv, then virtualenvwrapper , then configure independents environments. with script modif in the middle for dealing with proxies... aaarrrgg   nicolas Aug 27 '12 at 9:54
  	  	
@nicolas Yeah, easyinstall is just an outdated interface to setuptools. Pip is awesome, and virtualenv offers the kind of control that you don't get in many other languages without WAY more hackish tactics; perl being the only comparable exception. Ruby has gemsets, but in order to easily swap out Rubies, it's recommended to use either rbenv or rvm - both of which have always felt somewhat hackish to me (though they work beautifully once set up properly).   AndrewPK Oct 16 '12 at 19:30
2	  	
This exact procedure is automated by pip for windows.   user474491 Dec 24 '12 at 21:40
2	  	
+1, help note for noobs like me: don't type "python2x" literally in the windows path environment variable. Replace x with the python version you have, e.g. python27   dbjohn Dec 29 '12 at 22:11 
When I have to use Windows, I use ActivePython, which automatically adds everything to your PATH and includes a package manager called PyPM which provides binary package management making it faster and simpler to install packages.

pip and easy_install aren't exactly the same thing, so there are some things you can get through pip but not easy_install and vice versa.

My recommendation is that you get ActivePython Community Edition and don't worry about the huge hassle of getting everything set up for Python on Windows. Then, you can just use pypm.

In case you want to use pip you have to check the PyPM option in the ActiveState installer. After installation you only need to logoff and log on again, and pip will be available on the commandline, because it is contained in the ActiveState installer PyPM option and the paths have been set by the installer for you already. PyPM will also be available, but you do not have to use it.
Works for 32bit as we
Then run the following (which may require administrator access):