Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-02

From: Bruce Lowekamp <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:05:38 -0500

Alfred,

Thanks for the feedback.  I really regret not objecting to the non- 
orthogonal endpoint-independent and address-dependent combination in  
4787, but I made a pass through the whole document to make the  
terminology correct (including the hyphenation), so it should be  
fixed in -03.  Also clarified the ALG text.

Thanks for the comments.

Bruce

On Dec 9, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:

> Comments on draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-02
>
> by Alfred E. Heggestad <[email-masked]>
> 9. Dec 2007
>
>
>
>
> > 2.2.  Example Use with P2P Overlays
> >
> >   behind NATs to avoid the cost of dedicated servers.  A supernode
> >   candidate requires that its NAT(s) offer(s) Address Independent
> >   Filtering.                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >   ^^^^^^^^^
>
> There is no such things as "Address Independent Filtering". See RFC  
> 4787
> for the definitions. What you probably mean here is "Endpoint  
> Independent"
> filtering
>
>
>
>
> > 3.6.  Detecting Generic ALGs
> >
>
> It should be noted wether this test is applicable to UDP, TCP, TLS  
> over TCP.
>
>
>
>
> > 4.3.  Determining NAT Filtering Behavior
> >
> >   its alternate IP address and alternate port.  If the client  
> receives
> >   a response the current behaviour of the NAT is Address Independent
> >   Filtering.                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >   ^^^^^^^^^
>
> There is no such things as "Address Independent Filtering". See RFC  
> 4787
> for the definitions. What you probably mean here is "Endpoint  
> Independent"
> filtering
>
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave