Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Behave Digest, Vol 38, Issue 20

From: Huan Huan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:41:14 +0800

In fact, I think draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64 had addressed some opinions
from draft-liu-behave-ftp64, for example, when Server ack message including
address and port, client should use IPv6 address (not IPv4 address) to
connect, there is similar in two drafts.

From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email-masked]>
> To: liu dapeng <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:10:31 +0200
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] adopt draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64-06 as WG item
> On 23 okt 2009, at 13:04, liu dapeng wrote:
>
>  We know that there are two drafts discussing the ftp64 issue. Would
>> the WG consider merging draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64 and
>> draft-liu-behave-ftp64 as the WG document?
>>
>
> Do you feel the current text in draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64-06 doesn't
> address your previous objections?
>

Best Regards,
-- 
Huan Huan

BII Group
IPv6 R&D Center
Technique Project Manager