Subject: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE survey results

From: "Dan Wing" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:47:30 -0700

We received 14 responses to the survey.  The chairs and our AD will use the
results as input to BEHAVE's re-chartering and new milestones.  Thanks to
everyone that provided feedback in the survey.

PDF screen-shot of summary results (easier to read than the ASCII below)
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/dwing/behave/behave-survey-summary.pdf

Responses from (in alphabetical order):

  bo zhou          [email-masked]
  chengang         [email-masked]
  Congxiao Bao     [email-masked]
  Dapeng Liu       [email-masked]
  Dean Cheng       [email-masked]
  Ed Jankiewicz    [email-masked]
  Hui Deng         [email-masked]
  Linfeng Zheng    [email-masked]
  Shin Miyakawa    [email-masked]
  Simon Perreault  [email-masked]
  Tao Sun          [email-masked]
  Xiaohu XU        [email-masked]
  Xing Li          [email-masked]
  Zhen Cao         [email-masked]

BEHAVE scenario 3 (An IPv4 network to IPv6 Internet):
	currently deployed in a production network (with NAT-PT):  7.1% (1)
	future code/product: 35.7% (5)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 21.4%
(3)
	not needed: 7.1% (1)
	don't know: 28.6% (4)

BEHAVE scenario 4 (IPv4 Internet to an IPv6 network)
	currently deployed in a production network (with NAT-PT): 7.1% (1)
	future code/product: 42.9% (6)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 35.7%
(5)
	not needed: 7.1% (1)
	don't know: 14.3% (2)

IPv6-only hosts encountering IPv4 address literals
	future code/product: 14.3% (2)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 35.7%
(5)
	not needed: 0.0% (0)
	don't know: 50.0% (7)

avoiding NAT64 with dual-stack host for local networks
	future code/product: 57.1% (8)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 7.1% (1)
	don't know: 28.6% (4)

avoiding NAT64 with dual-stack hosts for remote networks
	future code/product: 35.7% (5)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 28.6% (4)
	don't know: 28.6% (4)

Cross-vendor NAT state synchronization
	future code/product: 57.1% (8)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 0.0%
(0)
	not needed: 21.4% (3)
	don't know: 21.4% (3)

NAT load balancing
	future code/product: 71.4% (10)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 14.3%
(2)
	not needed: 7.1% (1)
	don't know: 14.3% (2)

Traceroute across a stateless-only translator
	future code/product: 28.6% (4)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 21.4%
(3)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 21.4% (3)

large scale NAT
	future code/product: 28.6% (4)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 21.4%
(3)
	not needed: 7.1% (1)
	don't know: 42.9% (6)

negotiation of IKE across an IPv6/IPv4 translator
	future code/product: 50.0% (7)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 0.0% (0)
	don't know: 42.9% (6)

Generic IP address referral mechanism
	future code/product: 50.0% (7)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 14.3%
(2)
	not needed: 0.0% (0)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

Port Control Protocol
	future code/product: 64.3% (9)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 0.0%
(0)
	not needed: 0.0% (0)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

multicast, ASM translation
	future code/product: 21.4% (3)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 14.3%
(2)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)	
	don't know: 28.6% (4)

multicast, SSM translation
	future code/product: 28.6% (4)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 14.3%
(2)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 21.4% (3)

multicast, Scenario 1: An IPv6 network receiving multicast from the IPv4
Internet
	future code/product: 21.4% (3)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

multicast, Scenario 3: The IPv6 Internet receiving multicast from an IPv4
network
	future code/product: 14.3% (2)	
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 42.9% (6)

multicast, Scenario 4: An IPv4 network receiving multicast from the IPv6
Internet
	future code/product: 21.4% (3)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

multicast, Scenario 2: the IPv4 Internet receiving multicast from an IPv6
network
	future code/product: 14.3% (2)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 42.9% (6)

multicast, Scenario 5: An IPv6 network receiving multicast from an IPv4
network
	future code/product: 21.4% (3)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

multicast, Scenario 6: An IPv4 network receiving multicast from an IPv6
network
	future code/product: 21.4% (3)
	future deployment in a production network (not with NAT-PT): 7.1%
(1)
	not needed: 35.7% (5)
	don't know: 35.7% (5)

analysis of BEHAVE solutions against NAT-PT
	write document: 64.3% (9)
	don't write document: 14.3% (2)
	don't know: 21.4% (3)

-d