Subject: Re: [bmwg] Internet Draft Review and Preparation in BMWG

From: Al Morton <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:16:46 -0400

Thank you, Carlos!  There's plenty of good info in this thread,
and I suppose we now have very well-informed authors and editors.

The next steps are yours, bmwg.
Al
bmwg chair

At 03:43 PM 9/22/2011, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
>Al,
>
>This is a good comparison
>http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/edu/raw-attachment/wiki/IETF80/80tools-Hagens.pdf 
>check slides 3, 5, and 14.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-- Carlos.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
>Al Morton
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:10 AM
>To: Kenneth Green; [email-masked]
>Subject: Re: [bmwg] Internet Draft Review and Preparation in BMWG
>
>At 07:14 PM 9/21/2011, Kenneth Green wrote:
> >...Different strokes for different folks but as a novice RFC author
> >Nroffedit comes out ahead on ease-of-learning and ease-of-use.
>
>Good, thanks for trying them out. With so many choices now,
>I hope we don't have anyone editing flat text files...
>
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg