Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] dot1dStpPortPathCost32

From: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:30:11 +0200

Unless I am missing something, I do not see how such a change would not mandate returning to Proposed. 

Regards,

Dan

> 
> a) Formally, we are not expected (or even allowed?) to add 
> objects while
>    moving from Draft to Standard. So this needs careful consideration
>    from the IETF procedures perspective and support by the AD.
> 

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib