Subject: [calsify] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-calext-01-01: (with COMMENT)

From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:38:30 -0800

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-calext-01-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-calext/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"generate documents describing existing vendor extensions which are in common
usage, and likely to be encountered in the wild."

Is there a reason this wouldn't be done in the ISE? I assume that in these
cases the IETF wouldn't have change control!