Subject: [Capwap] Issue 176: The WTP Static IPv4 Address should not have the Static bit

From: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:16:26 -0700

28) The WTP Static IPv4 Address should not have the Static bit, but
instead state that 0.0.0.0 means a static address is not to be used.

<PRC> Same comment as previous. I would like to solicit from the WG on
whether addressing this comment would really change the quality of the
specification. If it's a change for the sake of changing, I would prefer
to reject the comment.

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap