Subject: RE : New charter

From: "LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:25:49 +0100

Hi Kireeti and all

Yes to all, except 3b: Don't care

JL

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : [email-masked] 
>[mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de Kireeti Kompella
>Envoyé : mercredi 24 novembre 2004 07:22
>À : [email-masked]
>Objet : New charter
>
>
>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
>> If you have suggested charter updates, please send them to 
>Adrian and 
>> me.
>
>Thanks all for your input.  I have the following items; for 
>each, please say "Yes" (should be added to CCAMP charter), 
>"No" (should not be added) or "-" (don't care).  I'll remind 
>you once again that not all items will make it onto the new charter.
>
>Please keep this subject line (simply reply to this mail).  
>The deadline is Friday Dec 3, 17:00 PST.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
>3a) should the IETF take on L1VPNs?
>3b) if yes to 3a, should this be done in CCAMP?
>4) Waveband switching
>5) Control plane work
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
>7) Deployment considerations for GMPLS
>8) PCE requirements
>9) QoS control
>
>A rough idea of what each of the above entails follows.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
>	implementation shift from "MPLS" objects to "GMPLS" objects
>	BCP on deployment migration for the same
>
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
>	what addresses to use where
>	nits/clarifications of the specs
>	guidelines for path computation & constraints
>	survay
>
>3) L1VPN work items
>	identify protocol extensions needed
>	state what can already be done with what we have
>	do the actual protocol work for requirements that are not met
>	liaisons to SG13 as needed
>
>5) Control plane work
>	resiliency
>	graceful shutdown
>
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
>	for each address field, identify its nature and ITU equivalent
>	(may overlap with part of (2))
>
>
>4, 7-9 are obvious or have been elaborated on the mailing list.
>
>Kireeti.
>-------
>
>PS: The topic of GTTP has carefully been avoided.  More later.
>
>