Subject: Fw: Liaison to ITU-T Q3/15 about your Liaison "Reply on GMPLS/ASON Lexicography"

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:42 +0100

Hi,

This response from Hiroshi Ohta rapporteur of ITU-T Q3/15 indicates that
no specific action was required to their liaison, but that we should keep
them informed of our progress on the lexicography I-D.

Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hiroshi Ohta" <[email-masked]>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: Liaison to ITU-T Q3/15 about your Liaison "Reply on
GMPLS/ASON Lexicography"

> Dear Adrian,
>
> As we talked after the ccamp session yesterday, Q.3/15 expects
> a response to our liaison from ccamp in some form and hopes to
> continue this on-going dialog between ccamp and some Questions
> within SG15.  This is the reason for the mark "For: Action".
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hiroshi Ohta
> Q.3/15 rapporteur
>
>
> At 17:09 05/06/03 +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> >Title: Liaison to ITU-T Q3/15 about your Liaison "Reply on GMPLS/ASON
> >Lexicography"
> >To: ITU-T Study Group 15 Question 3
> >From: IETF CCAMP Working Group
> >For: Action
> >Deadline: August 1, 2005
> >
> >CCAMP would like to thank Q3/15 for their liaison and the useful
> >explanatory information it contains.
> >
> >The liaison is marked "For: Action" with a deadline of August 31,2005.
> >However, there are no obvious requests for action within the liaison.
> >
> >Can you please clarify whether there was an intent to request specific
> >action.
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >Adrian Farrel and Kireeti Kompella
> >CCAMP Working Group Co-Chairs
>
>
>