Subject: Re: New revision of GMPLS TE MIB

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:30:38 -0500

Thanks  Adrian and Tom!

Will take a look at all 3 of the MIBs
and give update by end of this week.

Thanks,
  Joan

----- Original Message -----
From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: Joan Cucchiara <[email-masked]>; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
<[email-masked]>; Thomas D. Nadeau <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
Bill Fenner <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: New revision of GMPLS TE MIB

> Hi,
>
> I have just submitted a new revision of the GMPLS TE MIB
> (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-13.txt) which should be posted soon.
>
> The changes are to complete the markups from MIB Doctor review and
> comprise changes to the conformance and compliance sections of the MIB
> module as requested.
>
> I have also made the following changes:
> - added comments to IANAGmplsGeneralizedPid to highlight the lacunae.
> - updated references to RFC 4328
> - correct possible settings of mplsTunnelIsIf which is TruthValue
> - retire gmplsTunnelIsNotIntfcGroup which had become empty
> - correct the example to use gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipientType
>   and gmplsTunnelSendPathNotifyRecipient
> - correct the hex value of an IP address in the example
>
> We will show this to the MIB Doctors to check that they are happy with all
> of our changes, and then get the IESG process into motion.
>
> Adrian
>
>
>