Subject: [CDNi] Moving "non-repudiation" out of cdni-logging

From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:48:15 +0000

Hi everyone,

As part of the side discussions on cdni-logging, it became clear that:
	* the detailed objectives/requirements and draft solution specification around non-repudiation are not as mature as the rest of the cdni-logging material, and 
	* we need to better understand if/what other IETF work around non-repudiation maybe leveraged and how to best organise the work across CDNI WG and other IETF working groups/areas. 

Based on that observation, as well as the fact that it corresponds to a requirement with (only) [MED] priority, we reached a tentative agreement to:
	* take non-repudiation out of the cdni-logging document so we can don't get delayed in finalising cdni-logging
	* establish on the list the detailed objectives/requirements around CDNI Logging non-repudiation. This is to be lead by Iuniana.
	* have the WG Chairs investigate relevant other works and identify expert contacts in IETF that can help us move forward

If you have comments on this tentative agreement, please raise them.

Francois 

For memory:
"
o  "Medium Priority" indicates requirements that are to be supported
      by the CDNI interfaces unless the WG realizes at a later stage
      that attempting to meet this requirement does not achieve the goal
      of a deployable solution in a short timeframe (18-24 months) as
      needed by the industry.  This is tagged as "[MED]".
"