Subject: Re: [CDNi] IETF 98 f2f meeting?

From: Kevin Ma J <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:45:06 +0000

Hi All,

  (as chair) Based on the limited response, the chairs decided not to request a session in Chicago.  We would like to continue moving URI Signing forward on the list, and we welcome further discussion of HTTPS delivery topics, as they pertain to CDNI.

thanx!

--  Kevin and Francois

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Ma J
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 2:40 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: IETF 98 f2f meeting?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>   (as chair) Congratulations to the authors and the entire working group
> on getting RFCs 8006, 8007, and 8008 out!  A lot of folks put in a lot of
> hard work over the past 6 years and it is great to have the core specs
> finally published.
> 
>   With that, the only charter item still outstanding is the URI Signing
> draft, and I'm sure the authors are eager to have completed as well.
> 
>   The chairs wanted to take a poll to see if folks think we need a face-
> to-face meeting in Chicago.  If the only topic is URI Signing, then we
> could try to finish that up on the list.  If folks want to propose other
> agenda items (HTTPS, VR, etc.), please send mail to the list.
> 
>   Happy Holidays and Merry New Year to all!
> 
> thanx!
> 
> --  Kevin and Francois
>