Subject: Re: [Cellar] should flac-specification be informational or standards track

From: Michael Richardson <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:16:09 -0500

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[email-masked]> wrote:
    > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:30 PM Jerome Martinez <[email-masked]>
    > wrote:

    >> On 22/02/2022 03:14, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
    >> > The good news is that ultimately, we can (and should) dump questions
    >> > like this on our AD. If we have a strong inclination one way or
    >> > another, for reasons that we're starting to discuss, we should tell
    >> > him that, but we don't have to figure this out now.
    >>
    >> As the person who commented about this topic on the PR, I was worried
    >> about the status from the point of view from IETF but if IETF is fine
    >> with "standard", it is fine for me too.
    >>

    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/cellar/about/ has "Submit specification for
    > FLAC audio codec to IESG (Standards Track)", so I think this is "no action
    > required from the co-chairs or AD".

okay.
Then the pull request fixing it to std should be merged.

--
Michael Richardson <[email-masked]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide