Subject: [COSE] [cose-issues] Additional inconsistency between “none” and “direct” terminology (#44)

From: Mike Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:54:14 -0800

Issue #29 was incompletely addressed.  Some instances of "none" were changed to "direct" but some others were not.

Section 12.4.1 (ECDH) of draft -08 says "The key wrap algorithm can be 'none'" - rather than saying that the key wrap algorithm can be direct.  Table 17 also contains several remaining uses of "none".

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/44