Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-spec] Add Partial IV example (#104)

From: "Jim Schaad" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 21:54:28 -0800

That to me is more of an issue of the text being insufficient.  I have augmented the text to try and address this issue.

From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:54 PM
To: cose-wg/cose-spec <[email-masked]>
Cc: Jim Schaad <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [cose-spec] Add Partial IV example (#104)

Maybe it will be clearer once there's a rendered version available, but it's not clear to me how the Partial IV value 6:24999 is used to create the actual IV value, or how that relates to the text "Prefix for IV is 89F52F65A1C580933B52". The intent of the request for the example was for it to show semantically how the Partial IV value was used in the example cryptographic computation - not just show syntactically how a Partial IV value could be carried.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-spec/pull/104#issuecomment-163014849> .  <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AEt4dbQIdCkBrJEGIzmUvxdlXwCcFeiLks5pNzrxgaJpZM4Gv5n_.gif>