Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-issues] Should we support padding for Enveloped/Encrypted Messages (#53)

From: Mike Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:27:05 -0800

I agree that no change is needed to add this.  Applications can always define their payloads in a way that includes padding, if appropriate.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/53#issuecomment-184354174