Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Operational problem caused by inconsistent RA M

From: "David W. Hankins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:13:23 -0800

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:05:30AM +0000, HYUN WOOK CHA wrote:
> Do you think that this issue is an important item to be discussed in the DHC or 6MAN working groups?

i'd say DHC; it's topical to dhcpv6 client implementors.

> Since the previous effort by my collegue was not successful, I am not sure that this is suitable issue to be standardized. However, if you agree, I think that we can make more valuable guidance.

it seems putting RS/RA and DHCPv6 in the same sentence is a recipe for
controversy.  i would say it depends a great deal on how it is you
ultimately propose the problem be solved as to whether or not it might
be fruitful to try.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg