Subject: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration-04 - respond by April 13, 2014

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:07:31 +0000

Sorry for being a little late with this WGLC results announcement.

But the co-chairs feel that there wasn't sufficient support for this document (not just during the WGLC). And there were issues raised (by Marcin and myself).

I believe the way forward is:

1.       Update the document based on the comments (before and after last call).

2.       Find a few additional reviewers (over those that did in this last call), who will agree to review it during the next WGLC. (Perhaps this will need to await the Toronto meeting;  if so authors may want to consider a short agenda item to promote the draft and get reviewers.)

3.       Schedule another WGLC.

It is a bit frustrating as it would be nice to get this moved along (it is just now 2 years since the WG -00 draft was published).

-          Bernie & Tomek

From: dhcwg [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:04 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration-04 - respond by April 13, 2014

Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration-04)

feel it's ready for work group last call. Please review this draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published.

At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.

Tomek and I will evaluate consensus after April 13, 2014.

Thanks,

Bernie & Tomek