Subject: Re: proposed nlmLogEngineID clarification

From: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:10:14 -0800 (PST)

Hi -

> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 01:23:05 -0800
> From: Ramanathan Kavasseri <[email-masked]>
> To: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: proposed nlmLogEngineID clarification
> References: <[email-masked]>
> 
> Didn't see any responses to this. Should this object be deprecated?
...

Before we go that far, I'd like to hear from implementors:

    1) does your implementation function in a manner consistent
       with the proposed clarification?

    2) have you found this object to be useful?

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
 [email-masked]  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------