Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18

From: kaname nishizuka <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:49:57 +0900

Hi Tiru,

Thanks for the comment.
Yes, The YANG module is correct for both attributes. I understood how the YANG tree structure is generated.

regards,
kaname

On 2018/08/29 16:48, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
> Hi Kaname,
>
> The YANG module is correct for both attributes. I am not comfortable manually modifying the YANG tree structure.
>
> Regards,
> -Tiru
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kaname nishizuka <[email-masked]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:46 AM
>> To: Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <[email-masked]>;
>> [email-masked]
>> Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>
>> This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>> Yes, that's true.
>> Thus, "?" is required for upper-port in the subtree.
>>
>> The place of "?" was wrong by my mistake in the previous message.
>>             |  |     |  +--rw upper-port?    inet:port-number
>>
>> please see if the automatically generated subtree is consistent with the latest
>> draft.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kaname
>>
>> On 2018/08/28 23:19, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
>>> The subtree is automatically generated from the YANG module using
>> http://www.yangvalidator.com/, upper-port is optional and lower-port is
>> mandatory.
>>>            leaf lower-port {
>>>              type inet:port-number;
>>>              mandatory true;
>>>              description
>>>                "Lower port number of the port range.";
>>>            }
>>>            leaf upper-port {
>>>              type inet:port-number;
>>>              must ". >= ../lower-port" {
>>>                error-message
>>>                  "The upper port number must be greater than
>>>                   or equal to lower port number.";
>>>              }
>>>
>>> -Tiru
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Dots <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of kaname nishizuka
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 2:11 PM
>>>> To: [email-masked]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Dots] Reminder -- WGLC on
>>>> draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>    From a quick review, these are tiny nits though...
>>>>
>>>> Figure 4: DOTS Alias Subtree
>>>> <
>>>>              |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number  >
>>>>              |  |     |  +--rw upper-port    inet:port-number?
>>>>
>>>> Figure 8: DOTS ACLs Subtree (TCP Match) <
>>>>           |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask  >
>>>>           |              |     |     +--rw flags-bitmask?
>>>>
>>>> it is to indicate they are optional.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Kaname
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/08/22 7:03, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> The WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel ends Tuesday, August 27.
>>>>> Please
>>>> provide input on the mailing list by this deadline.
>>>>> Roman
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Dots [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Roman
>>>>>> Danyliw
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 4:30 PM
>>>>>> To: [email-masked]
>>>>>> Subject: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Consistent with our discussion at the Montreal meeting, we are
>>>>>> starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the DOTS Data Channel
>> draft:
>>>>>> DOTS Data Channel Specification
>>>>>> draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-18
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please send comments to the DOTS mailing list -- feedback on
>>>>>> remaining issues or needed changes; as well as endorsements that
>>>>>> this draft
>>>> is ready.
>>>>>> This WGLC will end on August 27, 2018.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Roman
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Dots mailing list
>>>>>> [email-masked]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dots mailing list
>>>>> [email-masked]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dots mailing list
>>>> [email-masked]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots