Subject: [issue57] Inconsistent operation types

From: Robert Haas <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:59:17 +0000

New submission from Robert Haas <[email-masked]>:

We need to agree on the operation types (still inconsistent in the draft):

for Configuration messages:
 set, delete, add, update, replace, del-all, cancel (are all these operations 
applicable ?)
 event-subscribe, event-unsubscribe

for Configuration-Response messages:
 the same operations but with *-response (set-reponse, del-response, etc)

for Query messages:
 get

for Query-Response messages:
 get-response

for Event-Notification messages:
 report

for Event-Notification-Response messages
 report-response

for Packet-Redirect messages:
 no operation (currently we have "payload" TLV)

Also the draft is inconsistent at many places, for instance, use of SET 
instead of SET-RESPONSE, etc.

----------
category: Technical
draft: draft-ietf-forces-protocol
messages: 211
nosy: rha
priority: Must fix
status: No discussion
title: Inconsistent operation types

___________________________________________________
Forces issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/forces/issue57>
___________________________________________________

---

From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:08:24 -0400

event-subscribe and event-unsubscribe will use Set.
We need Set, Get, Set-Response, Get-Response, and notification.
I don't think we need add or update operations.  I am not sure about delete 
/ del-all.