Subject: Re: Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10: (with COMMENT)

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:44:55 +1100

Hi Martin - 

> On 21 Jan 2015, at 9:37 pm, Martin Stiemerling <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> I just wonder if there is a second implementation, the shepherd report is pointing out one.

Follow the link - it's pointing to a list of 29 implementations (currently). HTTP/2 requires HPACK implementation.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/