From bruce@callenish.com Wed Jun 1 13:15:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAAAE0833 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FraQuE76wIdr for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biz82.inmotionhosting.com (biz82.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.202.87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CDBE06E9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.108.133.142] (helo=[192.168.145.101]) by biz82.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRroo-0006tw-MK; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:15:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4DE69DBF.7010501@callenish.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:14:55 -0700 From: Bruce Atherton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hybi@ietf.org References: <4DBA3809.4010004@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz82.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - callenish.com Cc: Greg Wilkins Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:15:09 -0000 On 31/05/2011 5:53 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: > > So if you have extensions A, B and C, each wanting to have opcodes and > flags then you might see a payload like: > > > > Except that in reality the semantics of that is actually > > < B > payload of < payload>>> > > Which essentially means that on the wire all you would see is > > > I understand your concerns about squatting on bits, but I don't follow your reasons for wanting this scheme. If A wants its own opcode and bits, why not let it put that into its extension data? Why not have something like: where is composed of: and is: and so on. A's crypto/compression/muxing could apply only after it had retrieved its opcode and flags. What is the benefit of popping the opcode and flag requirements up a level? From gregw@intalio.com Wed Jun 1 18:19:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85285E0749 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.656 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.279, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5mvynIQbKfl for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B875E0914 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so388334vxg.31 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:18:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.32.2 with SMTP id e2mr181215vdi.189.1306977512699; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.108.35 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:18:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE69DBF.7010501@callenish.com> References: <4DBA3809.4010004@oracle.com> <4DE69DBF.7010501@callenish.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:18:32 +1000 Message-ID: From: Greg Wilkins To: Bruce Atherton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hybi@ietf.org Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:19:02 -0000 Bruce, I think we are saying the same thing. I am proposing extensions put their stuff in the extension data - I was just not calling it that and saying they should put it in the payload. So what you describe is exactly what I was saying... just said differently. cheers On 2 June 2011 06:14, Bruce Atherton wrote: > On 31/05/2011 5:53 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: >> >> So if you have extensions A, B and C, each wanting to have opcodes and >> flags then you might see a payload like: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 >> >> Except that in reality the semantics of that is actually >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 < = =A0B >> payload of =A0 =A0< =A0payload>>> >> >> Which essentially means that on the wire all you would see is >> >> =A0 =A0 >> > > I understand your concerns about squatting on bits, but I don't follow yo= ur > reasons for wanting this scheme. If A wants its own opcode and bits, why = not > let it put that into its extension data? Why not have something like: > > > > where is composed of: > > > > and is: > > > > and so on. A's crypto/compression/muxing could apply only after it had > retrieved its opcode and flags. What is the benefit of popping the opcode > and flag requirements up a level? > > From self.disconnect@gmail.com Fri Jun 3 09:33:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B211E06C2 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:33:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CR5GMDYLabUk for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11E4E067F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1063466gwb.31 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Sv4sNbvjV2tXzvChURAef8TKkLdRoqx0JPOwrfmSo3A=; b=RL/YTQ4ugN4jA2K/hCOBk7/lJZwDKzYiefJz9UCmXoPywhHKw/drUJykDZh8LvSXEu KH5FD1+I9N/nFMQ8q/SJbb92RltRjS93cLBXagNxyXM4RmXlCJyoz8l9N5TrifYifHad GZS4QW07Fs5+4ys1Bt0KfAZL8hxnfmR5/IYT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FctFwmLMFcYELgQ9pCA8h38D6sXKNS5WZfWPPFvCMqaSx177Cpr/H4+wUduXcg9usV 0+buGmmadGPHd3EPkuoauFQQQR7CB6Wpslluxq2GKoyW/HwDAKIsvIouWMcQQB8ctWEo bXmFSLCOOHRTSngsQbeA1q/GGESqje+e+Mh1A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.176.33 with SMTP id d33mr1529145anp.2.1307118796083; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.197.18 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:33:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Self Disconnect To: hybi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bea285131a04a4d14f6d Subject: [hybi] Apache WebSocket module X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:33:17 -0000 --001636c5bea285131a04a4d14f6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 For those interested, I have updated the Apache WebSocket module on GitHub to support draft-07. git clone git@github.com:disconnect/apache-websocket.git It is an initial implementation, and feedback is welcome. -- def self.disconnect redirect_to http://github.com/disconnect/apache-websocket end --001636c5bea285131a04a4d14f6d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For those interested, I have updated the Apache WebSocket module on GitHub = to support draft-07.

git clone=C2=A0git@github.com:disco= nnect/apache-websocket.git

 --001636c5bea285131a04a4d14f6d-- From salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Mon Jun 6 00:04:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F54C11E80C2 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:04:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43b-l-0Ps4gF for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E17C11E80BE for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:04:52 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c17ae00000262e-78-4dec7c12e10a Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 89.71.09774.21C7CED4; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:04:50 +0200 Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CECE2356 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:04:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CDE50FCD for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:04:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: from n211.nomadiclab.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B8A508D8 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:04:50 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4DEC7C11.9070409@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:04:49 +0300 From: Salvatore Loreto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "hybi@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: [hybi] IETF81 in Quebec City X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:04:55 -0000 Hi, I have just requested a HyBi wg session for Quebec City. Agenda items are welcome, as always. best regards Sal -- Salvatore Loreto www.sloreto.com From gregw@intalio.com Mon Jun 6 19:32:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77E611E809B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:32:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGuAG0brCrYB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE9F11E8082 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so4101033vxg.31 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:32:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.18.11 with SMTP id s11mr969483vdd.269.1307413921468; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.108.35 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:32:01 +1000 Message-ID: From: Greg Wilkins To: Hybi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [hybi] Status? X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:32:02 -0000 Editors and Chairs, what's the current status/plans for a -08? cheers From ifette@google.com Mon Jun 6 20:31:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B21F0C4A for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.676 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-kaa1bVYiOB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615851F0C46 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.5]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p573VVNK024527 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:31 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1307417492; bh=qgShNF19kqGYov3nUDVu0wbNHgk=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=Q+GhuIKAs5hkzNb0gzq3Gm0FPyELWBmLtNV7QUcm20PnscZ9/oBdryygUjObMBCKP bkGlyttewjZ8bO82+pKcw== Received: from qwc9 (qwc9.prod.google.com [10.241.193.137]) by hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p573V2pl028422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:30 -0700 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so3365226qwc.27 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:31:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SH2sgGC/1bFr3zjQA8dtyHs92VSApazfEyYtpR2STRM=; b=c9ZEkLCiskYEbp+hcEnJhjgIUaigxqmyyEUj1/MzMY17S8CGJCWpPC8ZXmYunQ79et UAVRaBdxJ0r+3ZVBEu+g== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=k4ptjR7TIw+fygVKm1IkwqUClGOeYyHNbNp7jL8v2NYUMt8sKt0MDQGA3f5CsYaNlx 0Dc7OxVxJGfDbsWm9wdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.1.144 with SMTP id 16mr134743qcf.105.1307417489371; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.78.206 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:31:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?SWFuIEZldHRlICjjgqTjgqLjg7Pjg5Xjgqfjg4Pjg4bjgqMp?= To: Greg Wilkins Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed4f006f3ba04a516db84 X-System-Of-Record: true Cc: Hybi Subject: Re: [hybi] Status? X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ifette@google.com List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 03:31:34 -0000 --0016364ed4f006f3ba04a516db84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We're going over some final editorial passes. I believe we are targeting tomorrow (Tuesday), though there's a possibility it may slip to Wednesday. -Ian On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: > Editors and Chairs, > > what's the current status/plans for a -08? > > > cheers > _______________________________________________ > hybi mailing list > hybi@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi > --0016364ed4f006f3ba04a516db84 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We're going over some final editorial passes. I believe we are targetin= g tomorrow (Tuesday), though there's a possibility it may slip to Wedne= sday.

-Ian

On Mon, Jun= 6, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
Editors and Chairs,

what's the current status/plans for a -08?


cheers
_______________________________________________
hybi mailing list
hybi@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi

--0016364ed4f006f3ba04a516db84-- From ifette@google.com Tue Jun 7 16:06:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7C711E8120 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.676 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PGsSpWK3cAZ for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2C211E8106 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p57N6eKs030603 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:41 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1307488001; bh=SuNHzgdYBUh8D6q9Meqxj5e5RT4=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Content-Type; b=XDkgzvCOvCuTG2GKuIQVcyD8qDrevyftAlRIv9AgrKi4yk1n+6fHXkwulW/c4R6/c ZtEZRFJ0Dp0gJZTBMr5cQ== Received: from iwn34 (iwn34.prod.google.com [10.241.68.98]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p57N6dnm007727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:39 -0700 Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so6649089iwn.33 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=phRq0mqN2e1BXOFk+uQ13I44u0Y9GWpS1fnlN+09lzA=; b=EwxQDY4K50atEdmbfpgJukielPWyMOEFAVahroLqnLoVlx4zrAYDSTldK99jNJPljS BUlfKD1uwN/fPiqBINMw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DMBWNvcs2/7VthlqJ4CcmxvDdiOjY8vxQowXm5YyEMuMSyHNGfA4QsyHvHuHywGhMu zECw7qGkkEDUIlxsQ1yA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.74.2 with SMTP id s2mr9140535ibj.8.1307487999189; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.33.8 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:06:39 -0700 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?SWFuIEZldHRlICjjgqTjgqLjg7Pjg5Xjgqfjg4Pjg4bjgqMp?= To: "hybi@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6b2debd626c04a52745be X-System-Of-Record: true Subject: [hybi] WebSockets -08 X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ifette@google.com List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:06:43 -0000 --000e0cd6b2debd626c04a52745be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The I-D Submission Tool seems to be erroring out at some point, as it is not letting me complete the upload process. I have emailed ietf-action@ in an attempt to get this resolved, hopefully -08 will still go out tonight. FYI. --000e0cd6b2debd626c04a52745be Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 The I-D Submission Tool seems to be erroring out at some point, as it is not letting me complete the upload process. I have emailed ietf-action@ in an attempt to get this resolved, hopefully -08 will still go out tonight.

FYI.
--000e0cd6b2debd626c04a52745be-- From Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Wed Jun 8 10:30:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DEF11E8157; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:30:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.588 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rIa-m3odZHgX; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E0811E816E; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.55 Message-ID: <20110608173012.14596.50398.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:30:12 -0700 Cc: hybi@ietf.org Subject: [hybi] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-08.txt X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:30:15 -0000 --NextPart A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BiDirectional or Server-Initiated HTTP Working Group of the IETF. Title : The WebSocket protocol Author(s) : I. Fette Filename : draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-08.txt Pages : 68 Date : 2011-06-08 The WebSocket protocol enables two-way communication between a client running untrusted code running in a controlled environment to a remote host that has opted-in to communications from that code. The security model used for this is the Origin-based security model commonly used by Web browsers. The protocol consists of an opening handshake followed by basic message framing, layered over TCP. (In theory, any transport protocol could be used so long as it provides for reliable transport, is byte clean, and supports relatively large message sizes. However, for this document, we consider only TCP.) The goal of this technology is to provide a mechanism for browser- based applications that need two-way communication with servers that does not rely on opening multiple HTTP connections (e.g. using XMLHttpRequest or