Subject: [Ice] Proposal for ICE "renomination"

From: Peter Thatcher <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:04:15 -0700

As an author (not a chair), I just submitted a draft for an idea I'd like
to propose for ICE: renomination.

Here's the draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thatcher-ice-renomination/

The idea is basically to allow the controlling side to nomination more than
once, and have the last one win.  This would allow candidate pairs to be
switched over time as network conditions change.

Please let me know what you think.  In particular:

1.  Would you find this capability valuable?
2.  Do we need the ICE option?
3.  Do we need the STUN attribute?

Thanks,
Peter