Subject: [Idr] route leak discussion on NANOG list

From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:06:59 +0000

Just fyi...
Just in case some of us here do not often check the NANOG list,
there is interesting discussion taking place about route leak prevention.
You may check this post and the thread:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-June/086348.html 

The inputs/insights shared on NANOG provide additional corroboration for 
the common practice related to "intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention"
that is  outlined and recommended in Section 3.2 of  [route-leak-detection-mitigation-03].
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-03#section-3.2 

Sriram