Subject: Monthly Premium Update: 06/09/2014

From: Policy No 25-4949 <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:21:34 -0700

Mid-Year Policy Update
Generated for Ietf-dkim-archive
RE: Updated Rates Available

- Update policy while your healthy / http://www.ethsquare.com/policy/update/info.index

Different Life Stages and Experiences offer different benefits. 

~ Living the Single Life?
~ Getting Married?
~ Planning for Retirement?

See how your policy is affected by this -> http://www.ethsquare.com/policy/update/info.index

to modify message settings w/ Member Update Systems
write--9167 ROAD 177-O a k w o o d, O h i o -45873 or http://www.ethsquare.com/w4kt.wre3

Also, scraping fairly regularly formatted data from large documents is going to be WAY faster with judicious use of scan & regex than any generic parser. And if you are comfortable with coding regexes, way faster to code than coding xpaths. And almost certainly less fragile to changes in what you are scraping. 
Less fragile"? Almost certainly not. Regexes care about text-formatting details than an XML parser can silently ignore. Switching between &foo; encodings and CDATA sections? Using an HTML minifier to remove all whitespace in your document that the browser doesn't render? An XML parser won't care, and neither will a well-written XPath statement. A regex-based "parser", on the other h	
@xiaomao indeed, if having to know all the gotchas and workarounds to get an 80% solution that fails the rest of the time "works for you", I can't stop you. Meanwhile, I'm over on my side of the fence using parsers that work on 100% of syntactically valid XML.   Charles Duffy Jul 12 '12 at 16:07I once had to pull some data of pages, all with the same HTML template. They were littered with HTML errors that caused parsers to choke, and all their styling was inline or with <font> etc.: no classes or IDs to help navigate the DOM. After fighting all day with the "right" approach, I finally switched to a regex solution and had it working in an hour.   
you can use tidy to create valid XHTML   	
Using regex on a large page to get all the data in a large table is much faster than using  	
Paris Hilton might surprise us all one day. You never know.  definitely less fragile. When the third-party changes their html, they are much more likely to change the structure (breaking your xpaths) than the leaf nodes you are scraping. Scraping is not parsing. Scraping is pulling specific bits of data from a puddle of designer contaminated crap you don't care about. You DO NOT WANT to parse that puddle. You want to do only the absolute minimum amount of "parsing" that will get you your data. You don't CARE about the structure. You care about your , all with the same HTML template. They were littered with HTML errors that caused parsers to choke, and all their styling was inline or o classes or IDs to help navigate the DOM. After fighting all day with the "right" approach, I finally switched to a regex solution and had it working in an hThe OP is asking to parse a very limited subset of XHTML: start tags. What makes (X)HTML a CFG is its potential to have elements between the start a
 nd end tags of other elements (as in a grammar rule A -> s A e). (X)HTML does not have this property within a start tag: a start tag cannot co