Subject: Celebrity Reports: Rachael Dropped 4 Sizes

From: Real Time Trends <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:49:51 -0700

Celebrity Findings - Updated 06-08-2014 21:47:46

The #1 shared story trending this week:
Summary: Check out what celebs are raving about. How to slim down in time for Summer

Rachael and Oz Team Up to explain --
( http://www.huealb.com/celeb/rachel/drops/30.html )

With all the hype going on because of this video, more than likely you will love this too. 
"For people looking to end dieting for good, they need to see ASAP." -- Racheal Raymor

Enjoy Your Skinny Summer,
Team Rachael and Partners

This are article was published under these tags:  OZVideo, Rachael, Drop 3 sizes, Ray,
SlimDown, HolidayFit, Episode-243, Most Re-Tweeted, Liked on Facebook . . .
http://www.huealb.com/celeb/rachel/drops/30.html

to alter notification settings with member update systems-write-9 1 6 7 road 1 7 7-oakwood-ohio-45873
or http://www.huealb.com/3rf/544t/wr52f.html

escribes, so-called "regular expressions" can check for prime numbers in unary, which is certainly something that a regular expression from CS theory can't accomplish.    the same "only if" applies to all CFGs, does it not? I.e. if the (X)HTML input is not well-formed, not even a full-blown XML parser will work reliably. Maybe if you give examples of the "(X)HTML syntax errors implemented in real world user agents" you're referring to, I'll understand what you're getting at better.
26	  	
@AdamMihalcin is exactly right. Most extant regex engines are more powerful than Chomsky Type 3 grammars (eg non-greedy matching, backrefs). Some regex engines (such as Perl's) are Turing complete. It's true that even those are poor tools for parsing HTML, but this oft-cited argument is not the reason why.  "full and short" answer here. It leads people to learn basics of formal grammars and languages and hopefully some maths so they will not wast time on hopeless things like solving NP-tasks in polynomial timt's massive. My biggest question is why? You realize that all modern languages have XML parsers, right? You can do all that in like 3 lines and be sure it'll work. Furthermore, do you also realize that pure regex is provably unable to do certain things? Unless you've created a hybrid regex/imperative code parser, but it doesn't look like you have. Well, we're talking about the theoretical limits of the language; it's not like we just haven't figured out how to do it yet. If you u
 se pure regex, there's always goingParser is by definition bug free, while a Regex isn't? Because if an Xml Parser isn't bug free by definition there could be an xml that make it crash and we are back to step 0. Let say this: both the Xml Parser and this Regex try to be able to parse all the "legal" XML. They CAN parse some "illegal" XML. Bugs could crash both of thease, it isn't a regular expression proper. If it uses backtracking at all, or for whatever reason cannot be expressed in terms of empty strings, literals, and the empty set with concatenations, alternations, Kleene stars thereof (inductive concatenations), then it isn't formally regular. A lot of people here seem to think that all "regular expressions" are true, formal regular expressions. It's true that Thompson NFA regular expressions are not true regular expressions,he other problem with code like this is your serverside code has to deal with placeholder text as empty input, which has problems with edge cases where yo
 u want to enter a town called "Town". Instead of checking values against the placeholder text you should really use a data-modified flag on the input, and then clear the input on form submit if the flag is not set. And for AJAX interfaces you may not even have a form, so you should be able to associate an arbitrary submission event with the input.