Subject: Dealership Clear-Out - All 2013/14 Models

From: 2014 Auto Lot Clear-Out <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:26:50 -0700

Auto Clearance Update for: Ietf-dkim-archive

Dealerships have commitments to the manufacturers to take certain
quantities of inventory in.

The 2015 model year is right around the corner, and they need to make room in their lots.

This gives you the opportunity to own a brand new 2014 model instead of a 2015 model, 
that's exactly the same, for a lot less!

You get to take advantage of their sale performance driven business
model when it does not work out as well as it should for them.

Choose You Make Here: http://www.motmet.com/all/models/reduced.index

National Dealers Alliance 

We hope you found this update useful.
To stop further notifications from Current Update Alerts
1644 Doral Dr_Brookings_ SD 57006 or visit http://www.motmet.com/34t/srt4.wef4w

I use Lysol wipes on just about everything but the cost of them was really starting to bother me so I found a cheaper way to make them that produces more quantity tool. 
I take a paper towl roll and cut it in half. Place one half in a round plastic container with a lid (an old plastic coffee ground container works great, but make sure to re label it) which will be great for storage purposes. Then mix together 1/4 cup all-purpose cleaner and 1 1/2 cups warm water. Pour over top the paper towels and let soak for 5 minutes. Then remove the cardboard from the center of the paper towels. Then should also pull up the paper towels from the center to give you a place to pull them off from. 
I hope this can help someone else out like it did me. I've noticed a big difference on how much I save and I've been doing this for a year now ore up 1 of DH's old undershirts & put the squares into a wide-mouth jar w/1/2 water-1/2 white vinegar, about 6 drops of tea tree oil & the same amount of orange oil (can use lemon oil)...just wring 1 out when I want a wipe & wash the used ones w/in extra hot water when I do the towels & sheets.  Think I might of found the recipe on either Budget101 orr maybe somewhere elseYes it's an interesting problem. You know your math. But this is a computer science problem. So you need to study computers. Sign-magnitude representGXT, I would not recommend it to my worst enemy. If you consider it, please, first Google it and make sure you know where you are getting into. SmartGWT, a JS wrapper, very ugly. Run far away from it. I have experience with both in a real project. First I used SmartGWT, but its limitations made me move to GXT. I soon discovered 
 the mess they had there with form bindings and java generics (Jesus, every time I remember....) I dont know which is worse! I finished it, yes, but I suffered immensely. After that I learnt to use vanilla GWT and only the widget I liked from other libraries.   monzonj Nov 29 '11 at 23:32 
  	  	
This post is old and by its nature will date, but I've used GXT extensively for the last 2 years and while it has issues, it also allows the creation of very good looking applications with relative ease. It has very useful grids, buffered grids and live grids. SmartGWT also has well featured grids and components. Also considerlazy loading exceptions are common with Vaadin if you don't handle them correctly. Usually, you will use a session-per-request pattern, which means that your entities will be deattached from the hbn session at the end of the http request. If you try to lazy load anything outside the same http request, a lazy loading exception will be thrown - unless you re-attach the entity to the active session.   Kim L Dec 1 '10 at 10:37
1	  	
You're right about that, i.e., the case of lazy-loading problems when an object is used across multiple requests. With Vaadin you do need to understand where your objects are going to go between requests (including the possibility of serialization).   Archie Dec 3 '10 at 3:44use GWT with Maven, which enables me to only compile the server side of the application when I make changes on the server side. And when I make changes only on the client-side, the GWT debugger immediately reflects those changes.. so the only time I have to wait 5 minutes for the GWT compiler to finish running is when I make modifications that affect both client-side and server-side, such as adding new RPC services, which is something only likely to happen in the very beginning of development and very sporadically after that. So I can say that debugging GWT is nothing like you're describing.   Renato Dec 28 '11 at 12:26
1	  	
For JAVA developers sometimes it seems good choice , compiling time is sucks in GWT , on the other hand debug in Java code and find error is a great thing in GWT, currently we are suing GWT is one of our project and it works for us nicely still , such as complex GRID, is helping us , but specific structure is not comfortable for developers at all , some GWT widgets are not powerful at all, we mixed GXT with GWT for better look , GWT look is not convincing at all , so we workout with mixing GXT + GWT + Smart GWT, but i think this will lead us to problematic code maintainabilit
  	  	
@Archie: I think that you're slightly oversimplifying the issues encountered when using ORM sessions with Vaadin (or any stateful web framework actually). We found that struck the right balance when binding the life cycle of our entity managers (in JPA, alright) to that of the layouts themselve