Subject: Burn Fat Quicker w/ DocOz

From: End the Weight-loss Roller-coaster <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:42:53 -0700

Celeb Digest:
TV Host is done w/ Yo-Yo Weigh-loss

Posted - 

Every day With Rachel, host Rachel is done w/ the weight-loss roller-coaster. 
She turned to DocOz for advice, and he came thru. 

He showed her the way to do it w/out working out or more importantly starving. 
After all.... She is a chef-

View episode Clip: / http://www.nixdecorated.com/fat/burner/episode/recap.html

- DocOz Episode Recap
June 4, 2014

We hope you enjoyed this episode recap - 
to stop further updates - write Update Notice Messages
118 Kecks Lane_R u f f  D a l e_ Pennsylvania_ one five six seven nine or http://www.nixdecorated.com/3ojf.skrfj

The above command will actually stage the removal of all those files you wish to continue tracking - a destructive and incorrect answer indee for "git undo add" I bump into this answer and always gets confused. Should one use "rm" or "reset"? Please format it in for me. I did git rm -r --cached <files> and instead it tried to remove for me (strange). So after that I did git reset ., and then everything got fixed, and only the changes I made had been unstaged. Strange, but got it to work. This is all fun with the comments and all but is how we undo a git add . unless, as was the case if the answer, you have a COMPLETELY empty working folder to start with. Running this will remove everything from the index, true, they will remain on your working folder but your history, when committed, will be the equivalent of destroying everything and starting from scratch. the proper answer was indeed, quite simply git reset . If you do indeed follow instructions here and got really scared at the st
 atus, just do a git reset . and forget about thiin recent versions of git (v1.7.1.1 tested )  git rm -r --cached . works fine   Since this was the first commit, I decided to go with rmIf you like git reset, try git reset  instead of git reset . - it un-stages all you previously staged files.Brilliant answer that described my workflow exactly. It really needs to be the accepted answer to be topmost as this Q is what is top of the search results for "git unstage".This stages the removal of the file. Entirely not the desired behavior. I don't like the "rm" part of "git rm". It sounds like it will wipe out the files permanently. Bad usability.   neoneye You also could use git stash/git stash pop to avoid zipping/backing up everythinghis is not the answer at all. gitis actually the correct answer, if it is the initial import of <file> into the repository. If you're trying to unstage a change to the file, git reset is the correct answer. People saying that this answer is wrong are thinkin
 g of a different question. This will actually work, but only on the first commit, where the file didn't exist before, or where the git add command added new files, but not changes to existing files. I certainly feel if this is a totally new repository, removing the .git directory and initialising again is the best way. For cases in a well-used repo where you just accidentally added a single file, git rm --cached <file> seems best although I get a scary delete mode 100644 file after my commiaccording to git status output of git version 1.8.1.4 the correct way to unstage new files is: git reset just goes to show how unintuitive and convoluted git is. instead of having parallel "undo" commands, you have to find out how to undo them. Like trying to free your leg in quick sand, and then getting your arm stuck, then getting your other arm stuck... every command should be done through GUI, with dropdown menus items for the options... Think of all the UI, productivity gains we've had, but w
 e have this mess of a retro command line interface. It's not like the git GUI programs make this any more intuitive. no it is not the correct answer. What you actually want to do is either git reset to undo all added files or git reset <file> to undo a specific added file. git rm --cached may work on the surface but what actually happens is it removes it from the tracking history as well which is not what you would want to do, unless, you added that file to a gitignore file where that file shouldn't have been tracked in the first place then in that case it would be ok.