Subject: Application Details No. 37-74125

From: Adult Disability Report <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:11:41 -0700

Disability Evaluation Updates - 
Released July 7, 2014

Greetings Ietf-dkim-archive,

Overview: (Part I)

You can now see the updated disability benefits that you are eligible for
Here -> http://www.crosstugcor.com/guide/eval/details.index

Also, there have been provisions to what disabilities merit benefits.
To view The Listing of Impairments, which includes listings for both adults and children, 
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404

Go Here -> http://www.crosstugcor.com/guide/eval/details.index

Regards,

Benefit Services

-
-
-
-
-
-
To stop further notifications write "stop" to  Updated Notifications Services
115 Hadley Way
Counce, TN 38326 or visit http://www.crosstugcor.com/3kr/smf3.kg42ss

I don't think this is a good way of thinking. I'd just store and process all the dates in UTC and make sure that the front-end displays it according to the given time-zone. This approach is simple and predictable.   Kos Mar 3 '12 at 10:51
1	 	
@Kos: isn't storing and processing all dates in UTC exactly what TIMESTAMP is doing internally? (Then converting it to display your local timezone?)   carbocation Dec 9 '13 at 5:49 
1	 	
my local timezone? How would your DB know my timezone? ;-) There's normally quite some processing between the database and the user interface. I do the localisation only after the whole processing.   Kos Dec 9 '13 at 10:14
  	 	
@Koz: my database doesnt know your databases timezone :! But it does know the timestamp. Your database knows its own timezone setting and applies that when interpreting/representing the timestamp. 1:01am on Dec 11 2013 in Beijing China is not the same moment in time as 1:01am on Dec 11 2013 in Sydney Australia. Google: 'time zones' and 'prime merreat! But it doesn't work if other_table is a variable of type table, though :/   Rodrigo Gama Dec 28 '11 at 19:02
4	 	
@RodrigoGama - Why doesn't it? I'm using it with a variable table fine.   Omar Jan 19 '12 at 15:34
64	 	
'Table' is once used as name of the table and than as an alias. This is confusing. Maybe "Table t" would be Turns out I already upvoted this. I keep coming back here as I can never remember the syntax.   Ben Challenor Isn't this missing the WHERE clause in the question? I don't have a server on this system to test it but wouldn't you be able to add that to the ON like: ON Table.id = other_table.id AND other_table.sql='cool'? Or am This works by using UPDATE to iterate over the INNER JOIN. As such the ON functions as your WHERE clause and the INNER JOIN skips records that are not found in the JOINed table. Adding a WHERE clause would limit the result set of the JOINed table as well. @Roger Ray what version of MySQL and what was your query, as this DOES infact function as stated.   fyrye Sep 6 '13 at 17:14
1	 	
@BenChallenor Never mind, I keep coming here only to find my own answers.   nawfal Nov 21 '13 at 18:11
1	 	
@RogerRay, this question is about Microsoft SQL Server. Unfortunately, the syntax between various SQL implementations can vary.   Charles Wood Nov 26 '13 at 17:12
  	 	
@CharlesWood yeah. I have the same question in MySQL. It would be great if someone knows how to implement it to MySQL and share with everyone. I'm sure lots of people are looking for a MySQL version soluti