Subject: "Red" Smoothie Helps Alabama Girl Shed 80lbs!

From: "Helen F. Staton" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:20:02 -0400

CNN > Lose 28lbs In A Week

      HEALTH

The only thing I really do with the water now is wash clothes and flush the toilet, Young said
Both Young and Mason have tested their kids for elevated lead levels and found normal levels so far But lead only stays in the bloodstream for about 40 days, so its impossible to know whether a child has been affected earlier 
I take them to the doctor every few months to try to keep track of their blood levels, Young said So far were doing good, but its going to take a long time to actually see the effects of that

    
       Mouth Spray - US Panel Approved Women are reducing their hips by up to 8 sizes and losing 6 percent of fat
      
      	Here Is How It Works

   

            	+ Images (5)

            	+ Videos (2)

            

      
      	Product Details
				
					Safe and easy to use			
					Takes seconds to work	
					You never have to work out again			
					Sleep and reduce the size of your body
                    Works on all men and women			
					Makes you lose 2lbs a day	
					Gets rid of excess blubber on your body		
					Receive It Monday

                Watch The Full Report

      

dReception[edit]
Critical reception[edit]
 frvj Critics gave the film an overwhelmingly  frvj positive response, in particular the ensemble cast's  frvj performance and credibility. Although The Indian Express spoke positively of  frvj the cinematography and  frvj the film's story, it noted that "the message tha frvj t the film carries with it tends to get diluted  frvj towards the climax.[71] Praising the film's cast for their perfor frvj mance and the cinematography of B frvj inod Pradhan, Taran Ardash wrote that the film would be successful with the urban audiences.[71] T frvj he Hindustan Times summarized the film as being a "well-scripted, skilfully crafted [and] thought- frvj provoking entertainer".[72] Saisuresh Sivaswamy  frvj of Rediff.com  frvj wrote that films like Rang De Basanti  frvj can easily get into  frvj "p frvj reachiness", but frvj  believed Mehra got his message across while avoiding this,  frvj also appreciating the music, cinematography, dialogues and art direction.[73] The Hindu credited  frvj
Kamlesh Pandey for writing a story that would have been a difficult film to make, but it added by  frvj saying that the transformation of the youngsters into heroes seemed poetic. Altho frvj ugh the screenplay, direct frvj ion and the cast were also well-appreciated, the reviewer felt that Rahman's soundtrack lacked pace.[74]

The film also received positive reviews fro frvj m critics outside In frvj dia. The rev frvj iew from the BBC gave it the highest possible five star rating and added that it was "an entertaining mix of romance, history and social commentary".[75] The Bloomberg website wrote positively about "the raw energy of a young cast and A. R. Rahman's splendidly rousing soundtrack".[76]

Sight & Sound magazine conducts a poll every ten years of the world's finest film directors to find out the Ten Greatest Films of All Time. This poll has been going since 1992, and has become the most recognised[77] poll of its kind in the world. In 2012[78] Cyrus Frisch voted for "Rang De Basanti". Frisch commented: "Corruption became the subject of fierce debate in India after the major success of this film among youngsters."

2007 Academy Awards Best Foreign Film submission[edit]
Since the film "reflected contemporary Indian reality and had cinematic excellence", it was chosen as India's official entry for the 79th Academy Awards despite stiff competition from films such as Krrish, Lage Raho Munna Bhai, Omkara and Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna.[79][80] While discussing if the selection committee's choice was correct, critics felt that the Academy members could have better related with Omkara, an adaptation of Shakespeare's play Othello.[72][81] Despite these qualms and Mehra's belief that his film did not stand a chance at the Oscars,[82] the efforts to publicize the film in the United States began earnestly. Music composer A. R. Rahman performed several concerts across the East Coast to promote the film. Besides his efforts, producer Screwvala planned to use resources and expertise from his partners in 20th Century Fox and Walt Disney Pictures for organizing its publicity efforts.[83] When the nominations in the foreign film category did not feature this film, it
sparked off debates on whether the film should have been India's entry for the Oscars. In one such debate on a television channel that involved Screwvala, the selection committee was questioned about its knowledge of the requisite artistic criteria for such award ceremonies. While one outcome of the debate was on how Omkara would have been a better choice, the other discussed the West-centric sensibilities of the Academy members. However, results from a simultaneously conducted SMS poll indicated that 62 percent felt that the film was the right choice for the Oscars.[84]

Awards and nominations[edit]
Rang De Basanti received the National Film Award for Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment in addition to awards at a number of other ceremonies. It won several awards at the annual India-based Filmfare Awards including Best Film, Best Director, Best Music Director, Critics Best Performance - Male (Aamir Khan), Best Editing (P. S. Bharathi), Best Cinematography and RD Burman Award for New Music (Naresh Iyer) categories.[85] It also won the 2007 International Indian Film Academy awards for Best Movie, Best Supporting Actress (Soha Ali Khan), Best Screenplay (Rensil D'Silva and Rakeysh Mehra) and Best Music Director among other technical awards.[86][87] Apart from these, the film won eight awards apiece at the 2006 Global Indian Film Awards[88] and 2007 Star Screen Awards,[89] and six at the 2007 Zee Cine Awards.[90]

The film was also nominated for the Best Film not in English language at the 2007 British Academy of Film and Television Arts awards.[91][92]

Social influence[edit]

A pictorial collage that showcases how the Indian brands have used pictorials from the film (clockwise from top: Tehelka's second anniversary magazine, a Business & Economy periodical and Amul – a dairy products manufacturer).
Rang De Basanti had a noticeable impact on Indian society. A study of bloggers behavioral patterns during the first month of the film's release revealed a significant increase in public ire towards government and politicians for constantly being mired in corruption and bureaucracy and their inefficiency in providing basic amenities. Intense political discussions spurred on by the film's influence were observed in these patterns.[63] While commenting on this, writer D'Silva said that the film "has struck a chord somewhere".[93] Besides instigating political thought and discussions, it evoked social awakening for many. Some discussions rallied on how citizens should support and contribute to non-governmental organizations and exercising simple citizen duties of paying taxes and voting, while the others contemplated on how to become more responsible towards the country.[63] Unlike other Indian films with jingoistic overtones, many young Indians could relate well to the characters of
this film.[94]
 vjthe same rights as states in the Union to establish or disestablish slavery as a purely local matter.[48] The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 legisla
ted this doctrine.[49] In Kansas Territory, years of pro and anti-slavery vio vjlence and political conflict erupted; the congressional House of Repr
esentatives voted to admit Kansas as a free state in  vjearly 1860, but its admission in the Senate was delayed until January 1861, after the 1860 ele
ctions when southern senators began to leave.[50]The fourth theory was advocated by Mississippi Senator Jefferson Davis,[51] one of state sovereignty 
("states' rights"),[52] also known as the "Calho
u vjn doctrine",[53] named after the South Carolinian political theorist and statesman John C. Calhoun.[54] R 0frvj ejecting the arguments for federal  0frvj authorit
y vj or self-government, state sovereignty would empowe vjr states to promote the expansion of slavery as part of the Federal Union under the U.S. Constitut
ion.[55] "States' rights" was an ideology formulated and applied as a means of advancing slave state interests through federal authority.[56] As histo
rian Thomas L. Krannawitter points out, the "Southern demand for federal sla vjve protection represented a d 0frvj emand for an unprecedented expansion of  0frvj feder
a vjl power."[57][58] These four doctrines comprised the major  0frvj ideologies 0frvj  pre 0frvj sented to the 0frvj  American public on the matters of slavery, the  0frvj territories and
 the U.S. Constitution prior to the 1860 presidential election.[59]National elections
 vjBeginning in the Ame 0frvj rican 0frvj  Revolution and accelerating after the War of 1812, the people of the United  0frvj States grew in their sense of country as an impor
 vjtant example to the world of a national republic of political liberty and personal rights. Previou 0frvj s regional 0frvj  independence movements such as the Greek r
evolt in the Ottoman Empire, division and redivision i 0frvj n the 0frvj  Latin Ame 0frvj rican political map, and the British-French Crimea vjn triumph leading to an interest 
 vjin redrawi 0frvj ng Europe along cultural differences, all conspired to make for a time of upheaval and uncertainty about the basis of the nation-state. In the
 world of 19th century self-made American 0frvj s, growing in prosperity, population and expanding westward, "freedom" could mean personal liberty or property r
 vj ights. The 0frvj  unresolved  0frvj difference would cause failure—first in their political institutions, then in their civil life together.
Nationalism and honorNationalism was a p 0frvj owerful force in the early 19th century, with famous spokesmen vj such as Andrew Jack vjson and Daniel Webster. While
 vj practically all Northerners supported the Union, Southerners were split between those loyal to the entire 0frvj  United States (called "unionists") and thos
 e loyal primarily to  0frvj the southern region and then the Confederacy.[60] C. Vann Woodward said of the latter group,
 vjA great slave society ... had grown up and miracu vjlously flourished in the heart of a thoroughly bourgeois and partly puritanical republic. It had 
renounced its bourgeois origins and elaborated and painfully rationalized its i vjnstitutional, legal, metaphysical, and religious defenses ... When the
 vj crisis came it chose to fight. It proved to be the death struggle of a society, which wen vjt down in ruins.[61]
Perceived insults to  0frvj Southern collective honor i vjncluded the enormous popularity of Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852)[62] and the actions of abolitionist John 
 vjBrown in trying to incite a slave rebellion in 1859.[63]
While the South moved toward a Southern nationalism, lea vjders in the North were also 0frvj  becoming more nationally minded, and rejected any notion of split
 vj vjting the Union. Th 0frvj e Republican national electoral platform of 1860 warned that Republicans regard 0frvj ed disunion as treason and would not tolerate it: "We 
denounce those threats of disunion ... as denying the vital principles of a free government, and as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it is the 
 vjimperative duty of an indignant people sternly to re vjbuke and forever silence."[64] The South ignored the warnings: Southerners did not realize how arde
 vjntly the North would fight to hold the Union together.[65]Lincoln's electi vjonMain article: Un vjited States presidential election, 1860
 vjThe election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 was the final trigger for secession.[66] Efforts at compromise, including the "Corwin Amendment" and
  vjthe " vjCrittenden Compromise", failed. Southern leaders feared that Lincoln would stop the expansion of slavery and put it on a course toward 0frvj  extinction
 . The slave states, which had already become a minority in the House of  0frvj Representatives, were now fa vjcing a future as a perpetual 0frvj  minority in the Senat
 e vj and El vjectoral College again vjst an vj increasingly powerful  vjNorth. Before Lincoln took office in March 1861, seven slave states had  0frvj declared their secessi
 on and joined to vj form the  0frvj Confederacy.]]Outbreak of the war
S y0frvj ecession crisisThe  y0frvj election of Lincoln caused the y0frvj  legislature of South Carolina to call a state convention to y0frvj  consider  y0frvj secession. Prior to the war,
 South  y0frvj Carolina did more than any other Southern state to  y0frvj advance the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws and, even, secede from t
 he United States. The convention summoned unanimously voted to secede on December 20, 1860 and adopted the "Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which I
  y0frvj nduce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union". It argued for states' rights for slave owne y0frvj rs in the South, but contained a 
 complaint about states' rights in the North in the form of o y0frvj pposition to the Fugitive Slave Act, claiming that  y0frvj Northern stat y0frvj es were not fulfilling their
 federal  y0frvj obligations under the C y0frvj onstitution. The "cotton states" of Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas followed suit, seceding 
 in January and February 1861.Among the ordinances of secession passed by the individual states, those of three – Texas, Alabama, and Virginia – specifica
 lly mentioned the plight of the 'slaveholding states' at the hands of northern abolitionists. The rest make no mention of the slavery issue, and are often brief  y0frvj announcements of the
  y0frvj dissolution of ties by the legislatures.[67] However, at least four states – South Carolina,[68] Mississippi,[69] Georgia,[70] and Texas[71] – also pass
 ed lengthy and detailed  y0frvj explanations of their causes for  y0frvj secession, all of which laid the blame y0frvj  squarely on the y0frvj  movement to abolish slavery and that mo
 y0frvj  vement's influence over the politics of the northern states. The southern states believed slaveholding was a constitutional right because of the Fugiti
 ve s y0frvj lave clause of the Constitution.These states agreed to form a new federal  y0frvj government, the Confederate States of America, on February 4, 1861.[72] They took control of federal forts and ot
her p y0frvj roperties within their boundaries with little resistance from outgoing President James Buchanan, whose term ended on March 4, 1861. Buchanan said tha
t the Dred Scott decision w y0frvj as proof that the South had no reason f y0frvj or secession, and that the Union "... was intended to be perpetual," but that, "The power 
by force of arms to compel a State to remain in the Union," was not among the ".. y0frvj . enumerated powers granted to Congress."[73] One quarter of the U.S. Army
 – the entire garrison in Texas – was  y0frvj surrendered in February 1861 to state forces by it y0frvj s y0frvj  commanding general, David E. Twiggs, who then joined the Confederacy.
As  y0frvj Southerners resigned their seats in the y0frvj  Senate and the House, y0frvj  Republicans were able to pass bills for projects that had been blocked by Southern Senator
s before the war, including the Morrill Tariff, land grant colleges (the Morill Act), a Homestead Act, a y0frvj  transcontin