Subject: ISOC Board [was Re: DISCUSSION: rejecting candidates]

From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 16:22:16 +0200

This is irrelevant. The ISOC's revised governance model
has very minor impact on its role here - it simply means that 
a few ISOC Trustees (those selected by the IETF) may need to recuse
themselves, as has happened in the past.

   Brian

"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:
> 
> Given how the ISOC board is re-organizing itself, I really can't see how
> this helps, myself.   One black box outside another?
> 
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> > BTW, combating the "nomcom is a black box" feeling that Brian reports may
> > be one argument in favour of having an ISOC Board liaison on the Nomcom.
> 
> --
>                 Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   [email-masked]
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's hot here.<--
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/subscribe>