Subject: Re: RFC - 2229 / Dictionary Server Protocol

From: Bruce Lilly <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:30:11 -0500

>  Date: 2005-03-14 08:42
>  From: Gaurav Vaish <[email-masked]>

>    After ID writing, you gave me another tough task - "two independent
> and fully interoperable implementation". Hooh!

Note that that applies for the Standards Track, but not for
Informational RFCs.
 
>   btw, can I have these two implementations - in two different
> languages / platforms? ;-)

Sure; details are in RFC 2026.  Note however that simply translating
(e.g. Fortran to C) or whispering "this C program is now C++" doesn't
constitute independence of implementation.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf