Subject: RE: IESG powers - was: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:38:38 -0700

> Behalf Of Sam Hartman

> Fundamentally, though, 
> it is their desire to have interoperability that drives them 
> to work with the IETF.  That is the only power we have.

Ergo the attempt to force Sender-ID to use v=2.0 in order to create an
unnecessary interoperability failure is utterly doomed to failure.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf