Subject: secdir review of draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06, part II

From: "David Harrington" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:03:41 -0700

Hi,

I did a secdir review of this document to alert the SEC ADs to any new
security considerations.

Something I did not add to my review was a non-security concern.
Why was the secdir asked to review this non-WG document?
Or, more accurately, why is this topic not being handled as a WG item?
I think this is something the SEC ADs should be considering as well.

David Harrington
[email-masked]
[email-masked]
[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf