Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well

From: "Doug Ewell" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:15:38 -0700

IESG Secretary wrote:

> The intent is to make the note well shorter and more readable

Can this goal truly -- not just superficially -- be met if the reader
must "read [BCP 79] carefully," two RFCs totaling 21 pages, in order to
understand the Note Well text?

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸