Subject: [Int-area] comments to draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-01

From: Linda Dunbar <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:32:49 +0000

I am just repeating my comments made to draft-matsushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-01 during the InterArea WG session.

It seems to me that the case presented is the motivation for needing routers/switches in the network to dynamically change forwarding behavior that are triggered by external controller(s).
My question is: isn't it the right motivation for I2RS?

One of the co-authors stated on the microphone that it is. Just want to make sure what I heard is correct.

Linda