Subject: RE: TCP checksums

From: "Bound, Jim" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 02:26:51 -0500

Yes you can and a wonderful thing it is to build ones implementation
that way :---)
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markku Savela [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:14 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: TCP checksums
> 
> 
> 
> > From: "Sean Lin" <[email-masked]>
> 
> > 	Basically the checksumming in IPv6 and IPV4 are pretty much the 
> > same; same method but different pseudo-header. The format 
> of the ipv6 
> > pseudo-header is in RFC2460.
> 
> Minor additional tidbit...
> 
> ...you can use IPv6 pseudoheader for BOTH IPv4 and IPv6, if you use
> IPv4 mapped addresses for IPv4.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------