Subject: RE: Draft on a V6 documentation prefix

From: "Michel Py" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:23:18 -0700

> Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Like Brian says: ship it.

Concur. It does not go as far as I wished, but ship it anyway.

> BTW, is TLA still the good 'wording' for the prefixes allocated
> by the RIRs?

No; this entire terminology is gone see
draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-02.txt.

The "GRP" (Globally Routed Prefix) you suggested earlier would be fine
by me; I am already using it.

Michel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------