Subject: RE: draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-03

From: Rajesh M <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:35:49 +0000

+ IPv6

From: Rajesh M
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 8:02 PM
To: [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>
Cc: Ron Bonica <[email-masked]>; SPRING WG <[email-masked]>
Subject: draft-li-ospf-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-03

Hi All,

Please find few comments on this draft.

  1.  Its better to have SRv6 Locator TLV similar to what is there in draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.

  1.  Draft says O-flag: If set, then router is capable of supporting SRH O-bit

Flags, as specified in [I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header]. This must be

      O-flag: If set, the router supports use of the O-bit
      in the Segment Routing Header(SRH) as defined in

[I-D.ali-spring-srv6-oam].

  1.  SRv6 SID Link Attribute Sub-TLV, SRv6 SID LAN Link Attribute Sub-TLV here SID Flags must define

B-Flag: Backup flag.
S-Flag. Set flag.
P-Flag. Persistent flag.

Thanks
Rajesh