Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] doubts

From: Jeff Parker <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:52:18 -0400

Rams -
	As noted before, if DIS A has an LSP, he
shouldn't keep it under his hat.  B should have
heard about the latest version of LSP X before
A sent out the CSNP.  

- jdp

> hi,
> 
>        the diagram which I referred in my mail was ur first 
> diagram not 
> this. B and D are connected in PP circuit. A and B are in LAN.
> further  PSNP interval is 2 secs. So after processing the 
> CSNP, PSNP may 
> not be immediately sent. so by that time if minimum LSP 
> generation interval 
> is expired then there is a chance that it can happen.
> 
>       but any way one extra send might result  and it could 
> be either new 
> or old. is this right or wrong?
> 
> thanks
> rams.
_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg