Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] doubts

From: ramanathan rams <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:32:42 -0700

hi,

     in b,2   also one extra send of equal LSP may result because of the reason i gave in my previous mail for b,4.

thanks
rams.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jeff Parker [SMTP:[email-masked]]
Sent:	Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:57 PM
To:	[email-masked]'
Subject:	RE: [Isis-wg] doubts

> hi,
> 
>        one extra send of equal lsp case b,2  and  one extra 
> send of old lsp 
> or new lsp ( based on the time gap between sending the ssn request, 
> receiving the new lsp and checking of SRM flag for the LSP 
> propogation ) 
> will also occur because of b,4.
> 
> thanks
> rams.
 
I don't see that b.2 leads to an extra send.

I don't understand the scenario you describe for b.4

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg